No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …dismissal of the punitive damages counts and remanded, ruling for the plaintiff administrators and against the asbestos defendants including Celotex. Under the Illinois Supreme Court's National Bank decision, the Survival Act neither authorizes nor prohibits…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988

    Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …award, but modified the judgment to raise Raymark's share from 9.09% to 27.27% of damages because Raymark failed to prove fault by settling defendants Owens-Illinois and Armstrong. Under Texas comparative causation (Duncan)…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 9, 1992 · in the opinion

    Taliferro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1992)

    …Insulation, Inc., GAF Corporation Garlock, Inc., H.K. Porter Co., Inc., Southern Textile Corporation, Keene Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens- Illinois, Inc., Pacor, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Unarco Industries, Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …Picher Industries, Inc. [\1122] John F. Ledwith, Philadelphia, Pa., for Keene Corp. Peter J. Lynch, Philadelphia, Pa., for Owens-Illinois Glass Co. Joan K. Garner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Robert N. Kelly, Trial Atty…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …Pittsburgh Corning contends, inter alia, that such accrual date is too early; plaintiffs in their cross-appeal contend it is too late. In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Estate of Burt, 897 S.W.2d 765 (Tex…