Search

• Organization: Pneumo Abex, LLC ×
• Clear filters

7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

   Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

   …Owens-Corning's Distribution of Kaylo Manufactured By Owens-Illinois, Followed By Owens-Corning's Purchase of the Kaylo Division ¶ 53 In 1943, Owens-Illinois began operating the pilot plant to manufacture Kaylo. $2,849,000…

2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion

   Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)

   …of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill…

3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

   Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

   …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

   Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

   …no evidence of sufficient sustainability to support the claim or defense of the party opposing the motion...." (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) "On appeal…

5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion

   Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)

   …causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…

6. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

   Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

   …. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…

7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 2014 · in the opinion

   Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County (2014)

   …Campbell that under Rowland and Cabral, a landowner owes no duty of care to those coming into contact with persons whose clothing carries asbestos dust from the landowner's premises. The claim against Ford Motor Company…