No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 2013

    Ambruso v. Goulds Pumps (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …D. Roosevelt electrical engineer 1950s-1980s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1940s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy USS Chicago 1940s; insulator 1950s-1990s; general laborer, bus…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)

    …The 13 defendants remaining in his action are: American Biltrite, Inc., Burnham, CBS Corp., Conwed Corp., Domco Products Texas, Inc., General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Georgia-Pacific, Grinnell, Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Mannington Mills, Inc.…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …CBS Corporation; Certain-Teed Corporation; Crown Cork & Seal Company; Forest River, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; Genuine Parts Company; Industrial Holdings Corporation; Ingersoll-Rand Company; John Crane Inc.; Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138.) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to the issues presented by…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …he performed automotive repairs and, from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, he used brakes from Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Pep Boys, and NAPA stores. Deposition of Jon Burger, dated 3/29/06…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 6, 2020

    Koenig v. Pneumo Abex (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …it, and denied the plaintiffs' cross-motion for jurisdictional discovery. New York courts lacked general or specific personal jurisdiction over a non-New York defendant where the plaintiff's exposure and injury occurred in Massachusetts, and…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · May 23, 2012 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    He did not question the pathologist's opinion in terms of general causation, but he expressed circumspection concerning how that opinion translated to substantial-factor causation. See N.T., Aug. 17, 2005, at 105. For example…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)

    …found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …reasonable probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) "It is well settled…

  10. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Leathers v. Pneumo Abex (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in Rhode Island.\[1\] The Court noted that "this test comports with \[their\] Supreme Court's general causation jurisprudence and fairly balances the interests of plaintiffs and defendants."\[2\] The Sweredoski decision is a 2013 decision…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2012)

    …1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510\] (Weeks).) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    …as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …the direct and circumstantial evidence discussed herein — including general causation expert testimony to which ZF has not objected — is sufficient on its own to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Strick's…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …. which of Defendants' experts offer the challenged general causation opinion." (Id. at 30.) The Court did not have the benefit of knowing which experts seek to testify that exposure to vehicle friction products categorically cannot cause…