No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

127 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 7

  1. Company document · Sumner Simpson Papers · August 23, 1934

    Raybestos Division to W. H. Dunn on Johns-Manville's Invoices for Otto Binder's Work (1934)

    …Sumner Simpson Papers. Their index describes this document as follows: Transmittal letter for J-M invoices covering Binder's work. Directs General Office to pay same (invoices not attached). Related documents M. F. Judd to W…

  2. Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · January 19, 1944

    Sumner Simpson to Leroy Gardner on Reviewing Raybestos-Manhattan's Manheim X-Ray Films (1944)

    …company was "alright" in Gardner's records and for "the Metropolitan Insurance Company," "but I mean general publication." The letter answers the request Gardner raised with Brown earlier that month (Gardner and Brown on the X…

  3. Company document · Motley 1000 · July 31, 1978

    Hilton C. Lewinsohn and Harrison B. Rhodes on Medical Surveillance in the AIA Industry Statement (1978)

    …M policy except in California. A handwritten change to the draft softened the line that the general public is not at risk to say the industry considers it not at risk. It follows Marsh's June…

  4. Company document · Motley 1000 · June 2, 1978

    John H. Marsh to T. A. Dougherty and Others on an Industry-Wide Asbestos-Health Position (1978)

    …said "Asbestos workers do not seem to be more susceptible to lung cancer than other people unless they smoke," that there was "by no means general agreement" about the role of crocidolite and amosite in mesothelioma…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 24, 1983 · in the opinion

    Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp. (1983)

    …forum. Defendants have not shown that any hardship complained of is the result of proceeding to trial now. Nor is there a showing that the difficulties inherent in the general situation, including potential judicial inefficiency, constitute…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 5, 1985 · in the opinion

    Rosenberg v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    …101, 108 N.E. 217 (1915), and Carrick v. Central General Hospital, 51 N.Y.2d 242, 434 N.Y.S.2d 130, 414 N.E.2d 632 (1980), in support of her argument that she…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986 · in the opinion

    Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …Applicable Law. We begin with the proposition that in a tort action, as a general rule, proof that a [\1457] specific defendant caused the plaintiff's harm is a prerequisite to that defendant's liability to…