6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990
Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)
Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 6, 1988
Eckenrod v. GAF Corp. (1988)
…Porter, Raymark, Owens-Corning and Garlock, because the widow and co-defendant Pittsburgh Gage did not show the decedent was exposed to those defendants' asbestos products. To defeat summary judgment in an asbestos case, a plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion
Sawyer v. Fibreboard Corp. (In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases, 1991)
…jury's apportionment of responsibility was as follows: Owens-Illinois (6.5%); Fibreboard (6.5%); Pittsburgh-Corning (6.5%); Raymark Industries (13.2%); H.K. Porter Co. (5%); Eagle-Picher (3.5%); Owens-Corning Fiberglass (3%)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
…part, Consorti v. Armstrong World Indust., Inc., 72 F.3d 1003 (2d Cir.1995), vacated, Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., \_\_\_ U.S. \_\_\_, 116 S.Ct. 2576, 135 L.Ed.2d 1091 (1996), on remand, Consorti…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…Appellee, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and Fibreboard Corporation, Defendants/Appellants, Keene Corporation, Owens-Corning Fibreglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburg Corning Corporation, and Raymark Industries, Inc., Defendants. No. 86-2350. November 28…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · August 19, 1986
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1986)
…at his workplace and caused his disease, and awarded $2,500,000. The jury found for Keene and Owens-Illinois. The four losing defendants asked for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial or a reduced…