18 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986
Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…Damages; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Gilbert Plastering Company, Knoxville; Union Carbide plasterer Gilbert Plastering Company Knoxville 1947-mid-1960s; utility mechanic Union Carbide mid-1960s-1967
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 20, 1990 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Celotex Corp. (1990)
…might reasonably be drawn.'" Michelman v. Clark-Schwebel Fiber Glass Corp., 534 F.2d 1036, 1042 (2d Cir.) (quoting Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690, 696, 82 S.Ct. 1404…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion
Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (2000)
…keeping with the Second Circuit's more recent pronouncements on the subject. Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp., 110 F.3d 898 (2d Cir.1997). D. The Evidence Was Sufficient For The Jury To Find That Atlas…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1989 · in the opinion
Board of Education v. A, C & S, Inc. (1989)
…Fillippini, Jr., Keith A. Klopferstein, Edward F. Ryan and Mark A. Stang, of counsel), for appellant Union Carbide Corp. Michael P. Connelly, Bruce C. Howard and John R. Ostojic, of Connelly, Mustes & Palmer, of Chicago, for…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 27, 1986
Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…1960s. Its insurers (Zurich, Federal, Commercial Union, Globe and excess insurer Northbrook) disputed in a declaratory judgment action when their policies had to respond and who had to pay defense costs. After hearing nine medical experts…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 14, 1987
Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1987)
… no jury right. Zurich, Federal and Commercial Union won on the defense-duty issues, and Raymark won on the trigger and allocation issues. Under the policy language, an insurer must cover an asbestos claim if the…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987
Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)
…Harbor Island shipyard; Lake Union Drydock; Lake Union Drydock, Seattle; Puget Sound area shipyards; Puget Sound Bridge and Dredge (George Washington liner conversion) rigger Lake Union Drydock Seattle 1952-1972; rigger Puget Sound area shipyards 1942…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)
…s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · April 24, 1997 · in the opinion
Conway v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
…Id.; King v. Hahn, 885 F.Supp. 95, 98 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Thomas, 713 F.Supp. 62, 65. In order to prevail, the moving party must carry a…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990 · in the opinion
Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)
…There is no evidence in the record that any physician ever identified the "something" as pleural thickening nor did any physician link the "something" to asbestos exposure. Kraciun received a letter from his union after retirement…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…special interrogatories on a given element of a plaintiff's claim, all material factual issues should be included in such interrogatories. Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 714 F.2d 1028, 1032 (10th Cir.1983). III…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion
Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)
…industry. His testimony on the state of the art has the same relevance in every asbestos case, regardless of which corporations are the defendants. In view of the commonality of the state of the art issue…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990 · in the opinion
Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)
…RANEY, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of William Raney, Sr., Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., The Celotex Corporation, and Raymark Industries, Inc., Defendants- Appellants, The Anchor Packing Company, etal., Defendants. No. 384…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion
Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…Cir.1984); Donovan v. Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intern. Union and Its Local 423, 718 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir.1983); Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983); Hargrave…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion
Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)
…defendants, including Owens-Corning Fiberglas [\152] Corporation ("Owens-Corning").\[2\] Kirk alleged that her husband's mesothelioma was caused by exposure to dust from asbestos products during his employment at the New York Shipyard in Camden…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
…an overwhelming amount of evidence in favor of the movant that reasonable and fair minded persons could not arrive at a verdict against it. Cruz v. Local Union Number 3 of IBEW, 34 F.3d 1148…
-
Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion
District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)
…of actions commenced by a state after a statute of limitations would ordinarily have run.\[11\] The District of Columbia, however, has never been admitted to the Union as a state. The District is, of course…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…respondents. \[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals March 6, 1991.\] GROSSE, C.J. The Celotex Corporation\[1\] and Raymark Industries, Inc. (collectively referred to as appellants) appeal a jury verdict and award to…