No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983

    Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)

    The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and affirmed the circuit court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' common law punitive damages claims against the asbestos defendants, including Celotex, because those claims did not survive the…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …dismissal of the punitive damages counts and remanded, ruling for the plaintiff administrators and against the asbestos defendants including Celotex. Under the Illinois Supreme Court's National Bank decision, the Survival Act neither authorizes nor prohibits…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …applying Michigan law, rejected three. Alternative liability failed because not all possible suppliers, including Owens-Corning and Johns-Manville, were sued. Market share liability was unsuitable because asbestos products differ in harmfulness, and nothing showed the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …defendants' motion for judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] Johns-Manville Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation. Plaintiff did not name Johns-Manville because it had filed for bankruptcy status. \[2\] Contra Abel v…