No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 21, 1990

    Kreppein v. Owens-Illinois (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1990)

    The court granted Owens-Illinois' motion for reconsideration, held the widow's claims against it barred by collateral estoppel, and vacated the judgment as to it; it denied the JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions of…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990

    Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)

    …Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of about $450,000 for the widow, Edna Raney, against Owens-Illinois, Celotex and Raymark, holding the evidence let the jury find the missing asbestos warnings were a proximate…

  3. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983

    Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)

    The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and affirmed the circuit court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' common law punitive damages claims against the asbestos defendants, including Celotex, because those claims did not survive the…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 5, 1985

    Rosenberg v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    Stanley Rosenberg worked at the New York Naval Shipyard in Brooklyn from 1961 to 1965 and was exposed to asbestos products there. He was diagnosed with asbestosis in 1976 and malignant mesothelioma in 1978. He and his wife sued Celotex in New York…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986

    Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)

    The Fourth Circuit reversed summary judgment for National Gypsum and Owens-Illinois on the Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures…

  6. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · April 30, 1993

    Hogland v. Celotex Corp. (1993)

    Jessie Hogland sued several companies, some initially under fictitious names, claiming he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos-containing products. He died of the disease on November 10, 1985. In 1990 his wife, Yvonne Hogland, as…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989

    Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)

    The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Keene, Celotex and Owens-Illinois, ruling that plaintiff Irene Anjeski's sole product identification deposition could not support a jury finding that her husband was exposed to their…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    Mary Menne, as personal representative of her husband Donald Menne's estate, sued several asbestos product makers after he developed mesothelioma. Menne had worked as a pipefitter at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Washington in the 1940s, next to…

  9. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 5, 1985

    Meehan v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    Carmella Meehan, as personal representative of her husband Charles Meehan's estate, sued Celotex and other asbestos product makers, claiming their products caused his death. Charles worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard from 1942 to 1945, where he was…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987

    Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)

    Ruby Rice sued eighteen companies on behalf of the estate and heirs of her late husband, Norman E. Rice, who developed mesothelioma and died. She alleged he was exposed to asbestos products made or sold by the defendants and that they failed to warn…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · September 4, 1991 · in the opinion

    O'brien v. National Gypsum Co. (1991)

    …compensatory damages for wrongful death. Celotex's share of liability was set at 14.28%, the same share assigned to Raymark and each of the settling defendants except for Owens-Illinois, Inc., which was assigned 0…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · September 13, 1989 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1989)

    …defendants: Celotex, Eagle Picher Industries, Fibreboard, and Raymark. Defendants Keene Corporation and Owens-Illinois, Inc. were found not liable. The jury awarded damages to plaintiff Menne in the amount of $2,500,000.00. By stipulation…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 26, 1992

    Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Tenth Circuit vacated the judgment for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning and Celotex because the jury instructions wrongly imposed a duty to warn Mrs. Palmer, and remanded for a new trial, so the defendants prevailed…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 3, 1995

    Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp. (1995)

    The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that its earlier decision was the law of the case and the plaintiffs, the daughters of Dorothy Palmer, offered no new evidence. Under the law…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · May 7, 1986

    Silver v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    Frances Silver, executrix of her husband Henry Silver's estate, sued several asbestos product companies in federal court, claiming his death was caused by asbestos exposure. He worked from 1941 to 1961, mainly in North Carolina, as an insulator,…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    King v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …Celotex's attorney attempted to demonstrate that Mr. Gresham had considerable work experience with other companies' asbestos-containing products. With regard to Owens-Corning Kaylo, for example, Celotex's attorney asked: "\[Y\]ou used every bit…