No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 30, 2011

    Sublett v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2011)

    …finding General Electric had not established federal officer removal jurisdiction. A removing defendant must show the Navy prevented it from complying with state-law warning duties to establish federal officer jurisdiction and the government contractor defense…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    …the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)

    …2012) ("As a general rule, the existence of removal jurisdiction is determined at the time the removal petition is filed, irrespective of subsequent events. Federal courts have applied this general rule to federal officer removal jurisdiction…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018 · in the opinion

    Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…