8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · July 11, 2016 · in the opinion
Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2016)
…591, 113 S.Ct. 2786). "For example, there is no fit where a large analytical leap must be made between the facts and the opinion." Id. (citing General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · September 6, 2006
Fernandez v. Union Carbide Corp. (2006)
…raising evidence issues. At trial, medical records from his general physician's chart surfaced that neither side had seen before, including a pulmonologist's report. The trial court admitted that report but excluded handwritten notes of…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · August 23, 2018
Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2018)
…tort, and a corporation is not at home in a state, or deemed to consent to general jurisdiction, merely by substantial business there or by registering and appointing a service agent under Florida law. Personal Jurisdiction…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion
Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)
…jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Font (2020)
…chair' defense, the defendant need only answer the complaint with a general denial and argue to the jury that the injury was due to the negligence of a non-party to the suit." Vila v. Philip…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Rothchild v. Crane Co. (2014)
…467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). As a general rule, the Court must "limit\[\] its consideration to the pleadings and exhibits attached thereto" when deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Grossman v. Nationsbank…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · August 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Aubin (2012)
…is required to warn end-users directly: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Aubin (2012)
…is required to warn end-users directly: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user…