No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2014)

    …Corporation; General Electric Company; General Refractories Company; Grefco, Inc.; Henry Vogt Machine Company; Ingersoll-Rand Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Riley Power, Inc.; Triplex, Inc.; Ametek, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Viacom, Inc.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)

    …Texas City; Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City, Texas City pipefitter and general laborer Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 24, 2017

    Romano v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2017)

    …but reversed the damages ruling and raised the general damages award for the Romanos from $500,000 to $1,500,000. A solidary obligor gets a virile share credit only if the plaintiff released the other…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion

    Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)

    Accordingly, we hold that Zachry breached its general duty, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to Mrs. Chaisson by putting her in foreseeable risk [\190] of contracting an asbestos related disease from household exposure…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bourke v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2016)

    …56\] In Poche, the court began with the general premise that "\[a\] case that is initially nonremovable may become removable through the voluntary dismissal of nondiverse defendants."\[57\] All but one of the defendants—Eagle, Inc.…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 2011 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2011)

    …effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …at 3. "In general, a premises owner has a duty of exercising reasonable care for the safety of persons on its premises and a duty of not exposing such persons to unreasonable risks of injury or…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)

    …439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)

    …at 7-8). DSM further notes that these duties were inherited by the Utilization and Disposal Service division of the General Services Administration from September 1961 through 1965 after the Federal Facilities Corporation was dissolved. (R…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …509 U.S. at 596. As a general rule, questions relating to the basis and sources of an expert's opinion rather than its admissibility should be left for the jury's consideration. United States v…