No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    Wayne Woody, an insulator, and his wife Rebecca sued dozens of companies after he was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in 2006; he died shortly after the suit was filed. In 1979 the Woodys had sued 25 companies over his asbestosis and settled in…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Silviano v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2024)

    …HOLDINGS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DUNHAM-BUSH, INC., FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C., GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS LLC, GRINNELL LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., F/K/A ALLIED SIGNAL, INC./BENDIX, IMO INDUSTRIES…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)

    …The 13 defendants remaining in his action are: American Biltrite, Inc., Burnham, CBS Corp., Conwed Corp., Domco Products Texas, Inc., General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Georgia-Pacific, Grinnell, Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Mannington Mills, Inc.…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · July 11, 2016 · in the opinion

    Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2016)

    …591, 113 S.Ct. 2786). "For example, there is no fit where a large analytical leap must be made between the facts and the opinion." Id. (citing General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …difficult if not impossible, is irrelevant to the determination whether the forum is suitable unless \the alternative forum provides no remedy at all.' \[Citations.\]" (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.)…

  6. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · June 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. Co. (2012)

    …for further proceedings. BACKGROUND\[1\] ¶ 2 In 1970, OG & E constructed an electric power generating plant, using an engineering [\942] and construction firm as general contractor. Mr. Olsen worked for an insulation contractor hired by OG…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · August 23, 2018

    Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2018)

    …tort, and a corporation is not at home in a state, or deemed to consent to general jurisdiction, merely by substantial business there or by registering and appointing a service agent under Florida law. Personal Jurisdiction…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2020

    Peterson v. Vanderbilt Mineral (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …them earlier was inadvertent and the other side shows no prejudice. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that bar summary judgment, and a venue change motion served long after the answer…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion

    Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)

    Accordingly, we hold that Zachry breached its general duty, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to Mrs. Chaisson by putting her in foreseeable risk [\190] of contracting an asbestos related disease from household exposure…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Peterson v. Vanderbilt Minerals (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …Defendant argues that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation and there is no basis to sustain the cause of action for punitive damages. To prevail on a…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    …we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 6, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. v. Rossello (2018)

    …defendants; January 4, 2016 was the deadline for the plaintiff to name his "most likely to use" general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have been previously deposed; January 18, 2016…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)

    …address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…

  14. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …tested; whether it has been the subject of peer review; whether the theory has a known or potential error rate; and whether the theory has gained general acceptance in the scientific community. Daubert, 509 U.S…