No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    The federal district court denied summary judgment motions by General Electric, ViacomCBS, Air & Liquid Systems and Warren Pumps, and granted the Elorreaga family's motion for partial summary judgment that the government contractor defense does not…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · February 2, 2018

    Coury v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …keeping the case in federal court under the federal officer removal statute for General Electric and CBS. A settlement-related email from a plaintiff's side can be an "other paper" under 28 U.S.C…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …judgment to General Electric, Crane, Air & Liquid Systems (Buffalo), Aurora Pump, Atwood & Morrill, CBS, IMO Industries and Warren Pumps. Under the court's narrowed bare metal defense, a component maker can be liable under general maritime…

  4. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 27, 2017

    McCarthy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    The Superior Court denied the motions for summary judgment of Warren Pumps, Gardner Denver and General Electric, ruling that the decedent's pre-suit sworn statement was admissible and that plaintiff showed enough product identification to…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    Vernon Rublee died of mesothelioma in 2015. He had worked as a machinist at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1965 to 1980, where other workers mixed and applied asbestos-containing refractory products called Insulag and Panelag around the steam…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 24, 2020

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …and medical expert as speculative, and rejected them again. It granted the three motions and denied Deem's motions on affirmative defenses as moot. General Electric and CBS remained and were asked for a status report.

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …U.S. at 534, 115 S.Ct. 1043; Reynolds v. General Electric Co., 2012 WL 2835500 (E.D.Pa.2012). On the other hand, if the worker's exposure was primarily land based, then, even if…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022

    Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; The Bare-Metal Defense; Government Contractor Defense and Removal Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat wife who laundered her husband's work clothes Electric Boat 1957-1975

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)

    …successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · June 6, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2023)

    …Gorton recalled being present while machinist mates worked on pumps "in general," but did not have a specific recollection about the kinds of pumps on which those machinist mates worked or the manufacturers of the pumps…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Cicio v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    …and insulation. In the 1970s, Keeny worked for PSI, a division of Warner Electric, as a senior applications engineer and regional sales manager, where he inspected brakes and clutches at various commercial and industrial worksites, including…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …of 1963. (Id.) D. Plaintiff's product identification evidence Caterpillar Inc. Mr. Charlevoix stated that he performed maintenance work on eight Caterpillar bulldozers during his time at M.J. Electric. (D.I. 155, Ex. 1 at…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · October 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …detailed in his report that General Specifications for Machinery "required manufacturers to provide installation, operation and maintenance instructions as well as \safety precautions' as an essential part of Instruction Books for machinery and electrical equipment." (Doc…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …be contrary to the command for uniformity between rules governing the same injury, whether under the Jones Act or under the general maritime law. See id. There being no evidence that punitive damages were traditionally awarded…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Stevens v. CBS Corporation (2012)

    …that the "type of incident involved" have "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce," and that "the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Best v. The William Powell Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …engine, pumps, valves, steam traps, and turbines, and general cleanup. After he left the Navy, Best performed brake jobs on vehicles using asbestos-containing brakes. (NYSCEF 95). Defendants remaining in his action are Carrier Corporation, Goulds…