9 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)
…PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)
…General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Berry v. Anco Insulations (2019)
…defendants," Northern Pump Co., Warren Pumps LLC, Goulds Pumps Inc., Gardner Denver Inc. and Crane Co. \[3\] Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La. App. 1 Cir. 4/2/04), 878 So.2d 631…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Hall v. Warren Pumps LLC (2010)
…(See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987 \[manufacturers of asbestos products have a duty to warn of known risks posed by their products to ensure safe usage\].) Under a negligence theory…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion
Holliday v. Warren Pumps LLC (2008)
…to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease suffered by him, pursuant to the standard of proof articulated in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…in the business of selling such a product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. In Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…both by Wood and by the out-of-state cases that have followed in its wake, the Mays make a series of miscellaneous arguments. We reject each of them. First, citing Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…cases, the Washington Supreme Court held, in relevant part, that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of an asbestos-containing product that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Simonetta…