4 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)
…the plaintiff's favor, rejecting John Crane's argument that the consumer expectation test was inapplicable because expert witnesses were required. (See also Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 465 \[38…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion
Holliday v. Warren Pumps LLC (2008)
…to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease suffered by him, pursuant to the standard of proof articulated in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Hall v. Warren Pumps LLC (2010)
…causes of action for asbestos-related latent injuries. First, the plaintiff must "establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982.) Second…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)
…General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…