5 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)
…the plaintiff's favor, rejecting John Crane's argument that the consumer expectation test was inapplicable because expert witnesses were required. (See also Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 465 \[38…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion
Holliday v. Warren Pumps LLC (2008)
…to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease suffered by him, pursuant to the standard of proof articulated in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…in the business of selling such a product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. In Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)
…General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…