No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2019

    Young v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof; conflicting expert affidavits on general and specific causation raise issues of fact for trial, and plaintiffs need only show facts from which liability may reasonably…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)

    …can support specific causation. Where the trial court effectively apportioned 0% to settling defendants who were left off the verdict sheet, General Obligations Law § 15-108 offsets are computed by the aggregate method. Causation; Product Identification…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …employees or agents in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that WCD sold talc to Johnson & Johnson for nationwide distribution in cosmetic products. The court found no general jurisdiction, which the plaintiffs did not dispute. On specific jurisdiction…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 21, 2019

    Hernandez v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing that its product could not have contributed to the illness, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019

    Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)

    …non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Branson v. American International Industries (2016)

    …defense: We are of opinion that the privilege is of such a nature that it must be asserted at latest before the expiration of the period allotted for entering a general appearance and challenging the merits…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · March 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kirkwood v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2020)

    …avoid jurisdiction." In re Nazi Era Cases, 153 F. App'x at 823. While product line successor liability\[2\] is an exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, "no court, appears to have addressed ..…

  8. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · April 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2022)

    …plaintiff's evidence (see majority op at 344-347). To the extent the majority suggests there was a lack of any evidence of general causation, such a suggestion is unsupportable as there was an abundance of…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · August 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Fishbain v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)

    …was exposed from 1964, when she was nine years old, through the late 1970s— caused her to develop mesothelioma.\[4\] In general terms, the complaint alleged WCD supplied asbestos-contaminated talc to Shulton, Shulton incorporated the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 31, 2024 · in the opinion

    Protopapas v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. (2024)

    …of Directors of its ability to authorize a bankruptcy. (Id.) Appellants' position is that "when a state court appoints a general receiver to manage a corporation's affairs, that receiver obtains the sole authority to put…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    Campise v. Arkema, Inc. (2023)

    …tort cases: (1) that the plaintiff was exposed to a toxin, (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation), and (3) that the plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the…

  12. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Kaenzig v. Charles B. Chrystal Company, Inc. (2015)

    …a result of his exposure to defendant's asbestos-contaminated talc through contact with his father. With regard to general causation, Moline explained that asbestos contains microscopic fibers that are easily inhaled deep into the lungs…