292 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 15
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Lund v. 3M Company (2013)
…Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion
Flintkote Company v. Aviva Plc (2016)
…insurance policies." Dkt. 120 at 14. But as Aviva correctly points out, there is no such thing as a "national common law," a "federal general common law," or "prevailing law." See Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion
Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)
…and premises liability. They sought both general and punitive damages.\[6\] A first amended complaint was filed in May 2002, adding causes of action against the Regents for making false representations and for loss of consortium…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)
…Fitzgerald's opinion was based on the excluded testing, and therefore was also inadmissible. However, the court found Fitzgerald could give the general opinion that the product was "friable. . . that when dispersed it can be inhaled…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 2, 2013 · in the opinion
Swanson v. Simpson Timber Company (2013)
…lawyering." (Id. at p. 811.) As a general rule, an employee who sustains an industrial injury "arising out of and in the course of the employment" is limited to recovery under the workers' compensation system. (Lab…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · December 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization v. Wheeler (2020)
…Rumsey, California Department of Justice, Attorney General's of, Oakland, CA, Megan Kathryn Hey, California DOJ, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff State of California. I. Andrew Goldberg, Pro Hac Vice, Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Boston…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…claims specifically—the claims at issue here. (Dkt. No. 139 at 13.) Thus, Plaintiffs fail to establish that the relief sought has been historically available under general maritime law. See Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., No…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 20, 1984 · in the opinion
JT Thorp, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1984)
…had progressed, but doctors decided against attempting surgery. Butler remains in general good health and bicycles daily. The sole medical opinion concluded that Butler was not disabled as of the time of the opinion, but annual…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 27, 1998 · in the opinion
Petrini v. Mohasco Corp. (1998)
…70\]. Mohasco asserts New York cases are in accord, citing Grant-Howard Associates v. General Housewares (1984) 63 N.Y.2d 291 \[482 N.Y.S.2d 225, 472 N.E.2d 1\]; Mitchell v. Suburban…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)
…the in limine motion \operate\[s\] as a general demurrer to \[the\] complaint or a motion for judgment on the pleadings.' \[Citations.\] \Alternatively,' where such motions are granted \at the outset of trial with reference to…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1998 · in the opinion
Gutierrez v. Cassiar Mining Corp. (1998)
…fault, warnings Cassiar placed on its product, general knowledge by asbestos workers (by the early 1970's) of asbestos exposure risks, and preexisting lung conditions caused by Gutierrez having smoked and had exposure to tuberculosis (TB)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Continental Casualty v. Chatz for Cfb/wfb Trust (2018)
…from gaining an advantage by taking inconsistent positions, but also because of general considerations of the orderly administration of justice and regard for the dignity of judicial proceedings, and to protect against a litigant playing fast…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)
…according to Johnson, is on whether "the category of negligent conduct at issue, considering the general character of the event, is sufficiently likely to result in the kind of harm experienced, so that liability may be…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)
…(Owens); (2) distributors including Thorpe Insulation Company (Thorpe) and Bell Industries, Inc. (Bell),\[1\] and (3) general contractors including Holmes and Narver, Inc. (Holmes). The Garcias proceeded to trial against just two defendants, Duro Dyne and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)
…s defense depended on evidence of Johns-Manville's sophistication. "Although the record clearly show\[ed\] Johns-Manville was aware of the risks of asbestos in general, no evidence established it knew about the particularly acute…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 2014 · in the opinion
Ward v. Goss-Jewett Co. OF Northern California (2014)
…million in general damages for emotional distress, pain and suffering and the remainder in special damages for medical expenses and loss of earnings. The general damages awarded did not exceed the $6 million in general damages…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…and loss of consortium based on asbestos exposure. Appellants sought general and punitive damages against two groups of defendants: those that allegedly exposed Mrs. Gibbons and her family to asbestos through construction work\[2\] and the…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 15, 2017 · in the opinion
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2017)
…The Trustee has accepted this proposition.\[22\] According to the Illinois Supreme Court: The general rule is that where a person by his or her statements and conduct leads a party to do something that the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Ransford v. Griffin Wheel Company, Inc. (2009)
…law damage suits by former railroad workers against a locomotive manufacturer for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos in the manufacturer's products. (Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 471, 474…