228 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 12
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…plaintiffs' injuries. I. Standard of Review A motion for judgment on the pleadings is analogous to a general demurrer. (Ludgate, supra, 82 Cal.App.4th at p. 602.) Like a general demurrer, it tests the sufficiency…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010 · in the opinion
Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)
…if not all, of the cars he worked on were made by Ford, General Motors or Chrysler. As part of his duties, he used an air compressor to blow the dirt off the outside of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
…as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…the direct and circumstantial evidence discussed herein — including general causation expert testimony to which ZF has not objected — is sufficient on its own to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Strick's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…October 14, 2020, Dr. Staggs sets forth the general principles of asbestos-related disease; discusses the studies and reports identifying a causal relationship between asbestos-containing products and diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 27, 2018 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…evidence, a connection between defendant Ford Motor Company's products and decedent's exposure to asbestos. I do not address any other issues of general or specific causation reached by the Appellate Division. [\1119] Wilson, J…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Finerty v. Abex Corp. (2013)
…if proven, would be sufficient to demonstrate that the exercise of personal jurisdiction would be proper under either New York's general jurisdiction statute (CPLR 301) or New York's long-arm statute (CPLR 302), and…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…however, must be reasonable, that is they must "indicate the probable, as distinguished from a possible cause." Briner v. General Motors Corporation, Ky., 461 S.W.2d 99, 101 (1970). Id. at 872-73. More recently…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendant argues that Dr. Brodkin…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
Uribes v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2015)
…examines each argument in turn. A. Whether E.T. Horn Was Fraudulently Joined Standard for Determining Fraudulent Joinder In the Ninth Circuit, "there is a general presumption against fraudulent joinder." Hamilton Materials, Inc. v. Dow Chem…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion
Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)
…have "heeded a warning." Id. With this standard in mind, we disagree with VW for three general reasons. First, VW's argument misunderstands how we must view Sorrentino's testimony. Sorrentino testified that he referred to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…No. 20\]. The same analysis is true for the Plaintiffs' claims based on the duty to warn. As the Fourth Circuit explained in Baughman v. General Motors Corporation, 780 F.2d 1131, 1132-33 (4th Cir…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)
…not seen any reliable information to the effect that non-asbestos brake linings for drum brakes were commercially available for general or ordinary use prior to 1980 on automobiles or trucks." As part of his opinion…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · October 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Surita v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. (2017)
…supplies to support the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. \[Id. at 100:8-16.\] She was also responsible for general maintenance of her truck and trailers, including changing flat tires and working on the brakes. \[Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · April 2, 2021 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)
…made in discovery, and the reality that all anticipated jury trials have faced delays due to the global coronavirus pandemic, see General Order 21-08 (continuing all jury trials through April 30, 2021), the Court does…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)
…DISCUSSION In their amended complaint, plaintiffs have alleged claims against Ford for: (1) general negligence under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315; (2) employer liability in Ford's capacity as Victor Michel's employer under Louisiana Revised…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · March 10, 1999 · in the opinion
Sorenson v. Allied Products Corp. (1999)
…the purchase of White Farm's assets. 3) There has been no sufficient exception shown to overcome the general rule that a purchaser of assets is not liable for prior actions of a selling corporation. 4)…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…