327 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 17
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…rationale for why it should can be gleamed from the California law cited by the plaintiff. California follows the general rule of no duty to warn, but recognizes exceptions to that doctrine.\[13\] In Sherman v…
-
Blog · 2025
Appellate Ruling in Ford Motor Company Asbestos Case
…years primarily delivering parts and one year at the counter in the parts department at the dealership. After a trial, which included expert testimony regarding general and specific causation, jurors found in favor of the employee…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · April 18, 2017
Lovelace v. B&r Auto Service, Inc. (2017)
…and Workers' Compensation; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Southern Truck Service, Inc.; Built Rite general automotive mechanic working on commercial fleet trucks Southern Truck Service, Inc. 1976-1980; owner and mechanic doing commercial truck repairs Built…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 20, 2006
Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2006)
…a worksite, but a jury may not be left to speculate. A general expert opinion that parts from companies "like" the defendant likely contained asbestos, with no specific link to the defendant's products, does not…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…which the court held control asbestos cases, plaintiffs must offer expert proof of general causation and a scientific expression of the plaintiff's exposure to the defendant's product. An unquantified 'cumulative exposure' opinion and proof…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)
…Ante, at 1268. That is insufficient. Not every state law that "could be said to affect tangentially" matters within the regulated field is pre-empted. English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 85, 110…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016 · in the opinion
Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)
…and pipefitter at numerous jobsites, and was later diagnosed with mesothelioma. The defendant, Perini Corporation, had allegedly been the general contractor at three of those jobsites. (Casey, supra, 206 Cal.App.4th at p. 1225.) Casey…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Toy Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…Court orders otherwise, all case deadlines (other than the trial date, which will be vacated consistent with General Order No. 72-3) remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] For purposes of this order, "Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)
…to this case is thus incorrect. In any event, Dr. Staggs's general causation testimony clearly considers both types of asbestos and the possible differences between them. He acknowledges that, "some scientist\[s\] believe there's…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. Jones (2017)
…Jurisdiction and Minimum Contacts Mrs. Jones concedes that general jurisdiction does not lie and that she is proceeding only on a theory of specific jurisdiction under section 48.193(1)(a)(6), which provides for specific…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion
Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)
…found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…our opinion concluded, that "the peculiar facts presented by exposure to asbestos fiber from brake pads" made general order 21 "inapplicable to the facts of the claim stated by plaintiffs." Plaintiffs, Wheeler went on to point…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…This argument misses the mark. It is not "brake dust" in general that is being blamed as the causative agent in this case, but the asbestos particles contained in the Bendix brake dust from the relevant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…Dr. Horn could not give the likelihood of someone in the general population just developing pericardial mesothelioma without exposure to asbestos. He estimates it would be some fraction of the eight. After listening to the testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2023)
…(Doc. No. 89-37 at PageID\# 3403.) Parker Hannifin's General Counsel, Joseph Pophal, emailed Standard Motor's General Counsel, Carmine Broccole, writing: Parker tendered 100% of Parker's defense of the Barr case to Standard…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020 · in the opinion
Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…of a summary judgment motion, as well as foregoing the ruling on such a motion either temporarily until later in the proceedings or for resolution by trial of the general issue, involves not only pure legal…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…other words, an adequate warning might have allowed someone to avoid a risk of mesothelioma had there been an adequate warning. Because Ford's products were defective in that general way, and because Mr. Knecht was…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion
Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Appellants Billie Jean Adams and her three children (Adams) brought suit for general and special damages against respondent Ford Motor Company (Ford) following the death of their husband and father, Richard Adams…