532 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 27
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · March 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Gehant v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2022)
…at 19.) Plaintiff argues for a more expansive definition of "required" than the three situations described in DeVries. Relying on a District of Massachusetts case, Sebright v. General Electric Co., 525 F. Supp. 3d 217 (D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Wheeler Energy Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.), General Electric Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc., The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company d/b/a A&P Supermarkets, Honeywell International…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 13, 2021
Gilstrap v. CBS Corporation (2021)
…Robert E. Lee 1959-1964; trainee/trainer Nuclear Power School Idaho Falls 1964-1967; master chief, engine room supervisor / Chief of the Boat General Dynamics/Electric Boat shipyard (USS Omaha and USS Indianapolis) Groton 1975-1980
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
… Government Contractor Defense and Removal Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat and naval shipyards (Navy nuclear submarines) wife of a pipefitter who laundered his work clothes Electric Boat and naval shipyards (Navy nuclear submarines…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; The Bare-Metal Defense; Government Contractor Defense and Removal Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat wife who laundered her husband's work clothes Electric Boat 1957-1975
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…or in plans, without more, is speculation and does not suffice. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat, Groton wife of a pipefitter; laundered his work clothes Electric Boat Groton 1957-1970
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · May 15, 2017 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2017)
…shows is a genuine dispute as to this material fact. Evidence presented to the MDL court indicated that by the 1930s or 1940s "occupational health and the general medical literature documented the hazard of asbestos inhalation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Denbow v. CBS Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Friedman v. AO Smith Wter Prod. Co. (2014)
…defendant Appleton Electric LLC ("Appleton") moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross-claims asserted against it on the ground that there is no evidence that plaintiff Stanley Friedman was exposed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2012)
…the order of November 1, 2011, denied Pennsylvania Electric's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. As a general rule, a magistrate judge cannot "determine" a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See 28 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)
Brody's testimony to assist the jury's general understanding of mesothelioma in the same case. See Larson, 2010 WL 4676563 at [\3], n.3 (describing the Schumacher opinion). In Larson, Judge Robreno similarly upheld Magistrate…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)
…Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion
Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)
…the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)
…to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2023 · in the opinion
Rullo v. Abb, Inc. (2023)
…US, INC., FMC CORPORATION, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION, GEROSA INCORPORATED, GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC, GOULD PUMPS, LLC, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC., GRINNELL LLC, ITT LLC, INDIVIDUALLY, DOING BUSINESS AS AND SUCCESSOR TO ITT CORPORATION, BELL…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997 · in the opinion
Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)
…3\] (Emphasis added). In addition, the legislative history of C.J. § 11-108 indicates that the General Assembly intended that the cap apply broadly, as opposed to only malpractice claims. In January 1986, Senate Bill No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 15, 2019
Czulada v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…the complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, so the Czulada plaintiffs prevailed on the motion. A New York court has general jurisdiction over a company that was, at the time of the exposure…