No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

228 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 12

  1. Occupation

    Asbestos Exposure in Pipefitters and Plumbers

    …covering came through the pipe trades In the 1920s the magazine kept telling contractors that their business came through steamfitters and plumbers. Pipe covering work was with "owners, general contractors, steam fitters and plumbers" (Asbestos, Dec…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 6, 2022 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Eagle, Inc. (2022)

    …by Louisiana courts, \[54\] and involves a showing of both general and specific causation. "General causation is whether a substance is capable of causing a particular injury or condition in the general population, while specific causation…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Paulus v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2017)

    …so by letter brief, and they have done so. Appellant argues the court retains jurisdiction under the general authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 128 (courts have power to "compel obedience to its judgments, orders…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)

    …In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2013)

    …Landry's and Mr. Grisaffe's testimony are uncontradicted. Historically, latent disease cases in general and asbestos in particular, such as this one, the plaintiff has an extraordinary challenge of gathering evidence dating back 30 to…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 30, 1985 · in the opinion

    Martin v. American Petrofina, Inc. (1985)

    …Anderson, the insulation contractor, testified that as a general rule, a mastics insulation job could be expected to last five to ten years before it began to break down by becoming brittle and cracking. D.A…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    In re EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2015)

    …a preponderance of the evidence or even affirmative evidence, because to require such would incorrectly shift the burden of proof. Clophus v. General Motors Corp., 769 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. App.-Houston \[14th Dist.…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Courville v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2020)

    …Inc. ("Eagle") and One Beacon, its commercial general liability (CGL) insurer named as a defendant by the plaintiff, brought a third-party claim against another CGL insurer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G") seeking…

  11. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)

    …1995), trans. denied. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within ten years after the delivery of the product to the initial user or consumer…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)

    …injuries, and consequently, less justification for a departure from the general rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in…

  13. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Estate OF Blandford v. AO Smith Corp. (2016)

    …asbestos until the 1970s. Indeed, Rennecker states that Hart did have a general awareness about the hazards of asbestos when it became publicized, but he was not specific as to when that was. According to evidence…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …support a jury conclusion that W&G was the primary insulation contractor working at LRHS. This is not a case in which evidence was presented showing the general presence of asbestos-containing products at LRHS. Accordingly…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Aerco Intl. (2017)

    …generally that the law of different jurisdictions may apply, absent any analysis with respect to this issue, such general statement is an insufficient basis to deny consolidation. However, this determination does not preclude the parties from…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · June 30, 1992 · in the opinion

    O'banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    …Moore, 648 P.2d 21, 23-24 (Okla.1982); Kirkland v. General Motors Corp., 521 P.2d 1353, 1362-63 (Okla.1974) (adopting the Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 402A in products liability actions). \[6\] The court…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 21, 2006 · in the opinion

    Gilcrease v. Garlock, Inc. (2006)

    …We do not address whether reversible error occurred from an improper final argument. Citing the general rule that recovery of actual damages are a prerequisite to the receipt of exemplary damages,\[8\] Garlock next maintains that…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)

    …439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…

  19. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · November 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Correll v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co. (2006)

    …would result in the elimination of the Social Security credit passed by the General Assembly in death cases. The General Assembly determined that persons over 60 had restricted periods for recovery and reduced benefits based upon…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 26, 2006 · in the opinion

    Blandford v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2006)

    …also found that when a complaining party knows the identity of the other party's expert, the subject of his expertise and the general nature of his testimony, a party cannot complain that they are ambushed…