286 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 15
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · May 31, 1985 · in the opinion
Krull v. Celotex Corp. (1985)
…Supp. 818, 821-22 (N.D.Cal.1983). But the general rule in such cases remains that, subject to certain exceptions, the asset-acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the seller…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · March 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Calewarts v. CR Meyer & Sons Company (2015)
…However, being able to provide a general description of a substance's appearance does not provide a basis for testifying to the substance's chemical or mineral composition. Calewarts also argues the coworkers' extensive experience using…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · April 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2017)
…AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. James S. Chase, Edward C. Meade, Edwin Warren Small, Tennessee Valley Authority, Office of General Counsel, KNOXVILLE, TN, for Defendant-Appellant. Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, Circuit Judge, and LAMBERTH,\[\\] District…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · November 16, 2012 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2012)
…recognize an impeachment exception to the collateral source rule, but relied only on the "well-established" general rule. Because there appear to be good grounds to recognize an impeachment exception to the Washington collateral source rule…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000 · in the opinion
Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)
…American argues that Pustejovsky's lack of knowledge of the scope of his damages from his exposure to asbestos does not affect the accrual of his cause of action. Following these general rules, Rapid American contends…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 4, 2017 · in the opinion
Templet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2017)
… refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[111\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be "strictly construed in favor of remand," the federal officer removal statute's language must be liberally interpreted.\[112…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 14, 2013 · in the opinion
Tobin v. Aerco Intl. (2013)
…a seaman, Mr. Tobin stood watch on the bridge and deck, painted, and performed general repairs. He also visited the ship's engine room below deck where his coworkers performed work on pipes, valves, pumps, turbines…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Lindsey v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…a copy of this order upon the Trial support clerk, located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119) and the County Clerk (Room 141B) in accordance with e-filing protocol, and it is further ORDERED…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…motion is GRANTED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning specific causation. Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning general causation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony…
-
Court case · Kansas Supreme Court · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Harding v. KC Wall Products, Inc. (1992)
…the time the action was filed applies. It is a well-settled rule of law that "statutes complete in themselves, relating to a specific thing, take precedence over general statutes." Szoboszlay v. Glessner, 233 Kan. 475…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Prokocimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…continuing general belief that exposure to asbestos below the TLV of the time period of 5 million particles per cubit foot ("mppcf") of air did not represent a hazard to workers. There was no general recognition…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Parfait v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2019)
…Co., 149 F.3d 387, 397 (5th Cir. 1998). Another feature distinguishing the federal officer removal statute from the general removal statute is that, unlike § 1441(a),\[6\] § 1442(a) must be liberally construed. See Watson…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…Practice and Procedure § 4455 (3d ed. 1998). "The general rule is that \a judgment in a class action will bind the absent members of the class.'" Richardson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 839 F.3d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion
Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)
…and premises liability. They sought both general and punitive damages.\[6\] A first amended complaint was filed in May 2002, adding causes of action against the Regents for making false representations and for loss of consortium…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · February 24, 1986 · in the opinion
Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)
…reasons for the precepts and answers. 1. Legal Precepts There is general agreement upon the most basic principles of strict tort products liability. In order to recover from a manufacturer, the plaintiff must prove that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…b)(6) designees could not answer questions about the U.S. Navy's general knowledge of asbestos-related health hazards between 1968 and March 1974 (Topic 1); Harang Joseph Perkins' duties on the U.S.S…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Blackmon v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2014)
…In Babbitt, 104 F.3d at 90-91, the plaintiff employees had executed general releases as part of the railroad's early retirement program, releasing the railroad from any claims "of any kind whatsoever, known or…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…claims specifically—the claims at issue here. (Dkt. No. 139 at 13.) Thus, Plaintiffs fail to establish that the relief sought has been historically available under general maritime law. See Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., No…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Varner v. Ford Motor Co. (2007)
…P.O. Box 9900, Brookpark, Ohio 44142, Attorneys for appellees for ford Motor Company. Marc Dann, Ohio Attorney General, Dawn M. Tarka, Assistant Attorney General, 615 West Superior Avenue, 11th Floor, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, for Bureau…