No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

185 results for “General Electric”, page 10 of 10

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Feuerman v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)

    …All seven of the plaintiffs in proposed joint trial Group One are alleged to have been exposed, in general, to asbestos at commercial and residential job sites in and around the New York City area while…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)

    …9 (Tex. App.CHouston \[14th Dist.\] 2004, pet. denied). Foreseeability requires only that the general danger, not the exact sequence of events that produced the harm, be foreseeable. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has frequently stated…

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Placid Oil Company (2012)

    …form of notice Placid was required to give the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants to satisfy due process requirements and ultimately discharge their claims. In general, for unknown creditors whose identities and claims are not reasonably ascertainable…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Hearn v. Snapka (2012)

    …is no evidence of one or more essential elements of a claim or defense.") (internal citations, quotations omitted). In general, when a party files a hybrid summary-judgment motion on both no-evidence and traditional grounds…

  5. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 29, 2008 · in the opinion

    James v. 3M Corporation (2008)

    …play and substantial justice." Juelich, 682 N.W.2d at 570. The degree of the defendant's contacts with the forum state determines whether the defendant may be subject to general or specific personal jurisdiction. Marshall…