235 results for “General Electric”, page 11 of 12
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Steiner v. Hollingsworth & Vose Company (2018)
…s Brief, at 1. "Collateral review is appropriate, despite the general directive that appellate courts conduct review only of final orders, if an order is (1) separable from and collateral to the main cause of action, …
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Kardos v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc. (2019)
…Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. \ \ \ Pa.R.C…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2004 · in the opinion
Gibson v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board (2004)
…We note that, in general, questions concerning the admission and exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the tribunal and are not to be reversed on appeal absent a finding of an abuse of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)
…612. The Supreme Court struck down the state law, reasoning that: \[T\]he power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion
Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)
…contained asbestos. Joy also argues that to the extent that Plaintiff alleges that he was exposed to asbestos by being in the general vicinity when others performed repairs with which he was not helping, there is…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 8, 2012 · in the opinion
Petrina v. Allied Glove Corp. (2012)
…612 A.2d 500, 508 (1992); Pollock Industries, Inc. v. General Steel Castings Corp., 203 Pa.Super. 453, 201 A.2d 606, 611 (1964). Where a representative for a corporation acts within the scope of his…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Standard Steel, Lcc (2017)
…Forge operated the plant under the "Standard Steel" name. In general terms, Freedom Forge was engaged in the business of "manufacturing and selling railway wheels, railway axles and other forged metal products from various facilities and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…proposed solution. Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cautioned that it "would not direct the substantive common law away from well-established general norms in the absence of some clear predominance of policy justifications." Lance v. Wyeth…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1994)
…I. Bressman, Budd, Larner, Gross, Rosenbaum, Greenberg and Sade, P.C., Cherry Hill, NJ, for General Reinsurance Corp., etal., third-party defendants. Michael J. Geraghty, Sean R. Kelly, David D'Aloia, Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz & Goldstein, Newark…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 23, 2010 · in the opinion
Cowley v. Acands, Inc. (2010)
…deceased, former testimony is not excluded under the general rule disallowing the admission of hearsay.\[4\] Former testimony is \[t\]estimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 11, 2000 · in the opinion
In re Patenaude (2000)
…the instant case, where the possibility exists that even individual settlement negotiations will be more efficient if facilitated by a judge who is intimately familiar with the general issues and many of the parties, and where…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 15, 1981 · in the opinion
Tysenn v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)
…to which the claimant is exposed by reason of his employment, and (2) which are peculiar to the industry or occupation, and (3) which are not common to the general population. § 1208(n). In Utter v…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)
…breath. In so finding, Dr. Gelfand noted that, while the obstructive lung condition due to smoking showed "some improvement," in general, the reduction in lung diffusion remained severe. See Report of Dr. Gelfand concerning Frederick Summers…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)
…the state court matter, Defendant sought a defense and indemnification from Plaintiffs consistent with the provisions of the general liability insurance occurrence policies issued to Defendant between the years 1988 and 1992 ("the Policies"). (See Pltfs…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 29, 2002 · in the opinion
Gatling v. Eaton Corp. (2002)
…exertional intolerance, weakness, fatigue, and general malaise, as well was mental anguish. After trial, the jury returned a verdict against Appellants finding that Gatling did not have the claimed asbestos-related injury and did not have…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986 · in the opinion
Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Applicable Law. We begin with the proposition that in a tort action, as a general rule, proof that a [\1457] specific defendant caused the plaintiff's harm is a prerequisite to that defendant's liability to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 13, 2014 · in the opinion
Schott v. Viad Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2014)
…connection test requires that the incident could have "\a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce,'" and that "\the general character' of the \activity giving rise to the incident' shows a \substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity.'"…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998 · in the opinion
McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
…wages. \[4\] In Simmons, the supreme court noted a limited exception to the general rule that a plaintiff does not have a viable cause of action for asymptomatic pleural thickening. This exception recognizes that a plaintiff…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 13, 2004 · in the opinion
Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (2004)
…Trial, 12/4/01, at 32. Appellant argues that the opinion was inadmissible because it had no basis in fact nor general acceptance in the scientific community. We disagree. ¶ 11 Again, we observe that the admission…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2013 · in the opinion
Perry v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2013)
…U.S. at 611, 47 S.Ct. 207. Congress had bestowed upon the Interstate Commerce Commission the "general" power (which now rests with the Secretary of Transportation, see Kurns, 132 S.Ct. at 1266 n. 3…