224 results for “General Electric”, page 11 of 12
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)
…testimony. Second, with regard to Dr. Brody, Plaintiffs state that he was provided no case-specific materials and offers opinions only as to general causation. (Resp. at 5.) Plaintiffs also allege that Dr. Brody did not…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Logan v. AP Moller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)
…warn Mr. Logan of the dangers associated with Calidria because it provided adequate warnings to GP. Plaintiffs submit that apart from special orders and test shipments which were not available to the general public, all asbestos…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Bagwell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2020)
…art. 1813(E) provides: "When the answers \[to interrogatories\] are inconsistent with each other and one or more is likewise inconsistent with the general verdict, the count shall not direct the entry of judgment but may…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Larson v. Georgia Pacific (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2010)
…Angell noted that Dr. Brody's expert testimony at trial will be limited to "general testimony about how asbestos causes cancer and may not include any opinion as to specific causation in this case." (Mem. Op…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion
Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)
…have "heeded a warning." Id. With this standard in mind, we disagree with VW for three general reasons. First, VW's argument misunderstands how we must view Sorrentino's testimony. Sorrentino testified that he referred to…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · June 30, 2022 · in the opinion
Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2022)
…provides: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user directly or may rely on the…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 8, 2007 · in the opinion
Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores (2007)
…REV. RESPIRATORY DISEASE 363, 363-68 (1996)). One text notes that: There is general agreement from epidemiologic studies that the development of asbestosis requires heavy exposure to asbestos. . . in the range of 25 to 100 fibers…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)
…the Mono caulk. While working with decedent, they worked in locations where insulators were present and wrapping pipes in their vicinity or general area. Schultz did not know if the insulators created any dust. Darr testified…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Harris v. Ajax Boiler, Inc. (2014)
…the overhaul of any of the defendants' boilers. Plaintiff has no evidence to show that defendants' boilers required the use of an asbestos-containing cement, in general, or Narcolite in particular, to affect a proper repair…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)
…its employees in the construction and service departments working with asbestos, it is not reasonable to infer from the company's general safety consciousness alone, that it is highly probable that the company was aware of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion
Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)
…in sanding the tiles. Also, there was no evidence of a general nature. There was no evidence as to what type of tiles would have been used in Iran 35 years ago. There was no evidence…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 13, 2014 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2014)
…to the trial court, Dr. Mark's testimony simply "does not carry the day" because it is of a general nature, and because plaintiffs did not have any evidence of specific causation, the court could not…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion
Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)
…pp. 371-372.) There is insufficient basis for deviating from this general rule in the current posture of this case, particularly where to do so would require the taking of evidence. \[4\] Congoleum also appeals from…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion
Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)
…booster pumps, the bilge pumps, and fire and flushing pumps. Cunningham would have had technical manuals for such products available. In general, the manufacturers would provide their equipment to the shipyard, which would assemble, install, and…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 26, 1992 · in the opinion
Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)
…Appellants answered with a general denial that their products were defective and that they were negligent. The case was tried to a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs and against…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…specialist in occupational medicine called by Quarles, testified not about any specific facts of this case, but about the evolving general state of knowledge in medicine, science and industry, and about the dangers of asbestos in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION A. Motion to…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · August 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Aubin (2012)
…is required to warn end-users directly: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2020)
…tasks those employees regularly performed. Bonded Brake Program {¶ 23} To assist Flxible in starting a bonded brake business, Flxible's parent corporation, General Automotive Corporation, acquired a brake company located in Jackson, Michigan. At that time…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Aubin (2012)
…is required to warn end-users directly: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user…