No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

378 results for “General Electric”, page 11 of 19

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013

    Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)

    …summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California mid to late 1970's; owner of a home construction business who visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California 1970s; general contractor Construction projects 1960s and 1970s

  3. Medical study · Medical research · 2015

    Lung cancer risk among workers in the construction industry: results from two case-control studies in Montreal

    …In most previous studies, risks among construction workers were compared with general populations including blue and white collar workers. The main objectives of this study were to assess whether construction workers experience excess lung cancer risk…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    …we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc (2020)

    …inherent in the job. R. Doc. 449-2 at 19. In general, a premises owner has a duty to protect persons on the premises from the unreasonable risk of harm. Mundy v. Dep't of Health…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 23, 2005 · in the opinion

    IN the Matter of Cammarata v. Caldwell & Cook, Inc. (2005)

    …Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria L.L.P., Buffalo (John A. Collins of counsel), for Sheila Cammarata, respondent. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Estelle Kraushar of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent. Before: Spain, J.P., Carpinello…

  7. Court case · Nebraska Supreme Court · June 26, 1981 · in the opinion

    Osteen v. AC & S., Inc. (1981)

    …which we are now accepting as the law of this State, be deemed unjust, the remedy lies with the General Assembly." Id. at 487. A reminder of the root purpose of workmen's compensation legislation appears…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)

    …material fact, such as judicial admissions by respondent. In sum, because there was no factual basis for appellants' general assertion of causation, "\the conclusion is unavoidable that summary judgment was properly granted.'" (Saelzler, supra, 25 Cal…

  9. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)

    …American Home Assurance Company (American Home) seeks declaratory relief to determine its rights and obligations under a general liability insurance policy issued to defendant The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the Port Authority…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 31, 2022 · in the opinion

    Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Pifer (2022)

    …be produced. Irwin's counsel also argued that the Estate could not prove its strict liability manufacturing defect claim because it could not satisfy factors set forth in Phipps v. General Motors Corp., 278 Md. 337…

  12. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · November 21, 1997 · in the opinion

    Faulkner Const. v. Silicosis Fund (1997)

    …or other dust disease posing such a general threat to the industry. Hence whenever an employer asserts that the limitation of \[the predecessor statute\] should be applied to the dust disease causing the disability for which…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …of a summary judgment motion, as well as foregoing the ruling on such a motion either temporarily until later in the proceedings or for resolution by trial of the general issue, involves not only pure legal…

  14. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc. (2010)

    …cases of asbestosis and asbestos exposure, such that asbestos exposure in any amount other than general background levels would appear to be causative of mesothelioma,\[4\] we cannot read Borg-Warner, and the test announced therein…

  15. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 13, 2011 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Kcp&l Greater Missouri Operations Company v. Cook (2011)

    …the statutes. Essentially, it was an express affirmation that the Court in Staples correctly determined the General Assembly's legislative intent. In 1974, the legislature amended the Act to make coverage for occupational diseases mandatory. The…

  16. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …other words, an adequate warning might have allowed someone to avoid a risk of mesothelioma had there been an adequate warning. Because Ford's products were defective in that general way, and because Mr. Knecht was…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…

  18. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · November 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2007)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Klinger v. Alderete (2013)

    …p. 34.) Although the defendant in Campbell was a property owner, not a general contractor employer, at least some of the reasoning expressed in Campbell for finding no liability would potentially apply to the underlying lawsuit…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Appellants Billie Jean Adams and her three children (Adams) brought suit for general and special damages against respondent Ford Motor Company (Ford) following the death of their husband and father, Richard Adams…