No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

767 results for “General Electric”, page 11 of 39

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Louden v. AW Chesterton Co. (2008)

    …Halter & Griswold, LLP, 1400 Keybank Center, 800 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2688, for Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., Attorneys for Appellee. BEFORE: Cooney, P.J., Dyke, J., and Celebrezze, J. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION COLLEEN CONWAY…

  2. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Nooyen v. Wisconsin Elec. Power Co. (2020)

    …by a structural defect, rather than an unsafe condition associated with the structure.\[5\] ¶17 Jacqueline contends this court previously held in Viola v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 2014 WI App 5, 352 Wis. 2d 541…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 1999 · in the opinion

    White v. CBS Corp. (1999)

    …annexation" means a joinder or uniting of a chattel with realty for a specific purpose—here use of the turbines to generate electricity—coupled with the owner's intent to enhance the freehold by the improvement…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Duffy v. CBS Corporation (2018)

    666 carried the force of law due to the General Assembly not having codified that section, whether Scribner's reasoning was applicable to the statute of repose, or whether the manufacturer exception contained in CJP § 5…

  5. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Reera v. AO Smith Corp. (2014)

    …the employees of another subcontractor, New England Insulation, were working in the same general area at Mystic as Reera, installing and maintaining older boilers and high-pressure steam lines. Plaintiff also alleges that Reera was exposed…

  6. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · June 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. Co. (2012)

    …for further proceedings. BACKGROUND\[1\] ¶ 2 In 1970, OG & E constructed an electric power generating plant, using an engineering [\942] and construction firm as general contractor. Mr. Olsen worked for an insulation contractor hired by OG…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …The specifications provide that the contractor is to comply with all safety regulations and eliminate hazards to its own and other workers and that all work is subject to general supervision and inspection by PG&E…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)

    …the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…

  10. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)

    …to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …3\] (Emphasis added). In addition, the legislative history of C.J. § 11-108 indicates that the General Assembly intended that the cap apply broadly, as opposed to only malpractice claims. In January 1986, Senate Bill No…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion

    Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)

    …GAF Corporation, defendants. [\698] Franklin A Poff, Jr, Crisp Boyd et al, Texarkana, TX, for General Refractories Co., defendant. David Jonathan Fisher, Fairchild Price et al, Center, TX, for JT thorpe Co., defendant. Gregory Michael Sullivan…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)

    …money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)

    …successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 24, 2021 · in the opinion

    Barrosse v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2021)

    …of North America, wherein the Court noted the "general rule" that, "injuries sustained by employees when going to or returning from their regular place of work are not deemed to arise out of and in the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …of Daniel Ahnert, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU, PABST BREWING COMPANY, SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION, WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. 13-C-1456. January 7, 2016. United States District Court, E.D…

  20. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    … 15-1-35, citing the general rule that the statute began to run from the date of publication of the allegedly libelous statement to a third person. Staheli argued that the statute did not begin to…