No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

286 results for “General Electric”, page 11 of 15

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 6, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. v. Rossello (2018)

    …defendants; January 4, 2016 was the deadline for the plaintiff to name his "most likely to use" general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have been previously deposed; January 18, 2016…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion

    Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)

    …of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion

    Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)

    …signatory to the Saranac Agreement.) Abex received a copy of the 1948 Saranac report from Vandiver Brown, Johns-Manville's general counsel. Brown requested the nine financing companies meet in the Johns-Manville boardroom November 11…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2023 · in the opinion

    Perkins v. United States (2023)

    …engaged in the "ripout" or "tearout" of asbestos. The government fails to cite any authority for this proposition. It points to general studies, but does not demonstrate that Mr. Perkins did not "ripout" or "tearout" asbestos…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 6, 1992 · in the opinion

    Tragarz v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    …was diagnosed as suffering from malignant pleural mesothelioma, a cancer that is extremely rare among the general population but not as rare among those occupationally exposed to asbestos fibers. Expert testimony in this case indicated that…

  8. Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · October 27, 1999 · in the opinion

    Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …Wisconsin would not turn a deaf ear to argument that in a particular sort of case the policy reasons [\236] for allowing an exception override the policy reasons for applying the general rule. 236 Patzer v…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)

    …NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to GARLOCK, INC. and US GASKET CO.); GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARDIE-TYNES, LLC. (sued…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 29, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2022)

    …the evidence suggests that they nevertheless mandated asbestos-containing materials be used in the Vessels' construction without warning the general contractor or any subcontractors about the risks of asbestos or how to safely handle the substance…

  11. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)

    …been tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance. Id. at 593-594, 113…

  12. Court case · Arkansas Court of Appeals · April 3, 1985 · in the opinion

    Alcoa v. Vann (1985)

    … 81-1314(5)(iii) (Repl. 1976) provides: No compensation shall be payable for any ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed. These statutes require that a causal connection between the claimant's…

  13. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)

    …fiber that began or caused the process that resulted in mesothelioma, but that asbestos fiber in general is the only known cause of the disease. Dr. Maddox also testified that mesothelioma results from an individual's…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · September 4, 2002 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2002)

    …2d at 1272, n. 12. As we noted in Walls, this general rule is codified in La. Civ.Code art. 6, which also provides the exceptions thereto: In the absence of contrary legislative expression, substantive laws…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …awards for wrongful death and pain and suffering deviate materially from reasonable compensation. C — After remitting the verdict, the jury's award must be reduced by offsets pursuant to General Obligations Law § 15-108. These errors…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia · March 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Farmer v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …296-1 ¶ 19.) Testimony from another case regarding Honeywell's general practices without any evidence that such practices were followed in this case is not sufficient to create a genuine issue as to a material fact. \…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · September 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Westfall v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (1983)

    …45 S.Ct. at 613. This Court finds it unnecessary to reach the constitutionality of the 1982 amendment, either in general, or as applied to the facts of this particular case, in that the Plaintiff's…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)

    …not the admissibility, of Dr. Webber's testimony. \[61\] Indeed, this court rejected plaintiffs' otherwise-meritorious general challenge to Dr. Gibbs's expert disclosure for failure to raise that challenge before trial. (See Tr. at 4061…