No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

214 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 11 of 11

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …defendants, including Owens-Corning Fiberglas [\152] Corporation ("Owens-Corning").\[2\] Kirk alleged that her husband's mesothelioma was caused by exposure to dust from asbestos products during his employment at the New York Shipyard in Camden…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion

    Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)

    …A., 40 F.3d 622, 631 (3d Cir. 1994); see also Earles v. Union Barge Line Corp., 486 F.2d 1097, 1102 (3d Cir. 1973). "Maritime law has incorporated the doctrines of strict liability and negligence…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Dock (2017)

    …burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to that cause of action. (Union Bank v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573, 583…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion

    Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …an overwhelming amount of evidence in favor of the movant that reasonable and fair minded persons could not arrive at a verdict against it. Cruz v. Local Union Number 3 of IBEW, 34 F.3d 1148…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021 · in the opinion

    Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    …Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court in this asbestos-related personal injury action is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 filed by General Dynamics Corporation ("General Dynamics"). (D…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion

    Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)

    …(2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1272-1273; Silva v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 1024, 1028-1030), we need not reach that issue because of our conclusion that the Fonteses failed…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)

    …over federal enclaves is exclusive unless the deed of cession provides to the contrary or unless the cession is not accepted in the manner required by law. Lord v. Local Union No. 2088, Int'l Bhd…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …contractors who supervised the workers, and union officials.'" Appellants misconstrue the "feasibility" discussion in Farrar. First, the Court never stated that the feasibility of the warning depended on the ability of the manufacturer to warn an…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …two former Buck Kreihs employees, Michael Tonguis, corporate representative, and Jose Trigueros, a union boilermaker during the 1970s. Both of these individuals testified that Buck Kreihs worked with asbestos containing material. (See Rec. Docs. 414-5…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …1174 (9th Cir. 2016), "did not reflect a uniquely maritime rule but instead was based on settled common-law principles described in the Restatement." See Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 935 F.3d 852…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)

    …these standards as the trains crossed state lines, or adhere to the standard of the most restrictive states. First Sec. Bank v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 152 F.3d 877, 880-81 (8th Cir.1998)…

  12. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Co. (2020)

    …its "plain and ordinary meaning as derived from the dictionary." Mo. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Union Elec. Co., 552 S.W.3d 532, 541 (Mo. banc 2018). The dictionary defines the term "elect" to mean…

  13. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Hardick (2012)

    …that are common to every Navy vessel of that \[era or\] vintage"; (3) the "types of unions and gaskets" used on Navy vessels; (4) a United States Navy "qualified products list for compressed sheet gasket material…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 16, 2022 · in the opinion

    Thorne v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2022)

    …(Id. at 23:20-24:25, 26:3-9) Repair of a leaking valve involved removal of the insulation from the pipelines and from any joints or unions. (Id. at 22:1-6) Thorne used a…