292 results for “General Electric”, page 12 of 15
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 27, 2022 · in the opinion
Beierschmitt v. Grobet File Company OF America, LLC (2022)
…service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction.\[3\] Grobet argued it was not subject to general jurisdiction in California because it is not incorporated in this state and does not maintain its principal place of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)
…by asbestos, that medical tests showed that there were asbestos fibers in his lungs, that such fibers are not found in the general population, and that he had had a significant exposure to asbestos. Based on…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Paulus v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2017)
…so by letter brief, and they have done so. Appellant argues the court retains jurisdiction under the general authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 128 (courts have power to "compel obedience to its judgments, orders…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendant argues that Dr. Brodkin…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Unterleitner v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…19, 2010) ("\[S\]ettlement is insufficient to confer removal jurisdiction where the formal dismissal of the non-diverse defendant has not yet been entered.") (citations omitted); Guerrero v. General Motors Corp., 392 F. Supp. 2d 1133…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)
…2012) ("As a general rule, the existence of removal jurisdiction is determined at the time the removal petition is filed, irrespective of subsequent events. Federal courts have applied this general rule to federal officer removal jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Brantley v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2012)
…Federal officer removal, however, is an exception to this general rule. Because the federal government can act only through its officers and agents, it would be difficult to find those to act on its behalf if…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Berg v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)
…even commonsensically logical) rationale by which he could determine what percentage of the cans of Mennen shave talc sold in the relevant period contained talc from lots contaminated with chrysotile and/or amphibole minerals in general…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Brewer v. Crane Co. (2012)
…manual, which he described as a "Navy document that originated with the manufacturer." These general statements do not constitute evidence that Crane specified or required the use of asbestos in its replacement gaskets and packing. The…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2001 · in the opinion
Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (2001)
…installment on [\373] the date the installment becomes due." The Commission's comment to subdivision (a) provided: "Subdivision (a) of Section 685.020 continues the general rule as to the time postjudgment interest commences to run…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Both Plaintiffs and Defendant Armstrong failed to comply with…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Scott v. Lennar Corporation (2013)
…of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and chief of the Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, reported the results of his evaluation, undertaken at the request of leaders…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…I.\[4\] Except as to the named defendants, the FAC in Jones II was identical to the Jones I complaint with regard to the language in the general allegations, the first cause of action for negligence…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)
…his clothing, tools, vehicles, and general surroundings. As a proximate result of her exposure to asbestos, Lynn suffered severe and permanent injuries including throat cancer and progressive lung disease, from which she died. DEMURRER AND RULING…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 16, 1987 · in the opinion
Hughes v. Western MacArthur Co. (1987)
…issues and to apprise the defendant of the basis on which the plaintiff seeks recovery. (Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp. (1983) 35 Cal.3d 197, 211-212 \[197 Cal. Rptr. 783…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
Uribes v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2015)
…examines each argument in turn. A. Whether E.T. Horn Was Fraudulently Joined Standard for Determining Fraudulent Joinder In the Ninth Circuit, "there is a general presumption against fraudulent joinder." Hamilton Materials, Inc. v. Dow Chem…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)
…not seen any reliable information to the effect that non-asbestos brake linings for drum brakes were commercially available for general or ordinary use prior to 1980 on automobiles or trucks." As part of his opinion…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023 · in the opinion
Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)
…has held that comparative fault principles apply when apportioning liability between a strictly liable party and a negligent party. (See e.g., Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725, 736-737; Safeway Stores…