No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

235 results for “General Electric”, page 12 of 12

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982 · in the opinion

    Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    …Pa.R.App.P. 301(a). Appellants acknowledge the general rule that an issue not argued below may not be argued on appeal, but nevertheless assert that their argument is not waived. They say: [\293] The…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Company (2024)

    …in their depositions, both taken on March 26, 2019, that their father had served as the "general manager" of Lenox until his death in 1974, at which point they, along with a third brother, Paul Lang…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. The evidentiary record…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 13, 2015 · in the opinion

    Frank v. Honeywell International Inc. (2015)

    …Frank's second or third arguments. II. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 sets forth the general scope of discovery in civil suits: "Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Bednar v. Dana Corp. (2008)

    …provides, in pertinent part, as follows: The amendment provides a general rule that each party shall be entitled to four peremptory challenges, but gives the Court two alternatives to achieve "a fair distribution of challenges". First…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …individual to be served by "following state law for serving summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made." Fed R…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · April 5, 2006 · in the opinion

    Young v. Wcab (zinc Corp. OF America) (2006)

    …last place of employment. Polk, 640 A.2d at 506. The Polk court concluded that the general premise stated in Marcucci still applied, to wit, "that a specific \hit,' or fixed injury, has no place in…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 18, 1987 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. US (1987)

    …a trail longer and broader than Judge Gignoux's. To understand the First Circuit's approach to the matter, it will be useful to refer briefly to the general structure of LHWCA. Complementing the Jones Act…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · October 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2022)

    …... the courts have held that the pleader must establish jurisdiction with evidence from other sources, such as affidavits or depositions.... The general rule, therefore, is that a pleading's allegations of subject matter jurisdiction are taken…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Howard v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)

    …reports in asbestos cases must contain a discussion of the methodology supporting the expert opinion. There are enough nuances pertaining to this subject that we are unable to make such a general pronouncement here. We recognize…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2011 · in the opinion

    Howard v. AW Chesterton Co. (2011)

    …articles in an attempt to support their claims that respirable fibers were present. However much of this information is irrelevant to this case in general and ACE specifically. The simple fact remains that \[Appellants'\] attempt to…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Graver v. Allentown Cement Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2011)

    …Second, it recognizes the general principle of deference to the plaintiff's choice of forum. Allowing removal only when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a defendant ensures that the plaintiff will not be inappropriately forced out of…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Baumgart v. Keene Bldg. Products Corp. (1995)

    …835 (1967). However, we have long recognized an exception to this general rule which acts to toll the running of the limitations period. The discovery rule "provides that where the existence of the injury is not…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Breedlove v. CSX Transp. Corp. (2009)

    …based duties have become a "semantic morass." Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625, 79 S.Ct. 406, 3 L.Ed.2d 550 (1959) (citing Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 245 F.2d 175…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 30, 1983 · in the opinion

    Christman v. Dravo Corp. (1983)

    …232, 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956). See Director, OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, supra; Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 263, 99 S.Ct. 2753, 2757, 61 L.Ed.2d 621 (1979)…