327 results for “General Electric”, page 12 of 17
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion
Singer v. Pneumo Abex, LLC. (2012)
…product was ever, at any time, delivered to the National Avenue plant in general or to Building 35 in particular; • Any of Abex's brake shoes were ever present at the National Avenue plant, nor specifically…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)
…806 N.E.2d 645 (2004)), and it would be difficult to imagine a more general disclosure than the bare statement that defendant's products caused plaintiff's mesothelioma. Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 213(g)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · May 6, 2022 · in the opinion
Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2022)
…Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291, 297 (1980). The Due Process Clause allows for two types of personal jurisdiction: general and specific. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · June 21, 1995 · in the opinion
Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motor., Inc. (1995)
…intact. The dissent does not claim that the amendments changed the last injurious exposure rule enunciated in Meyer and Fossum. Instead, it attempts to assess the legislature's general intent. 135 Or.App. at 84. A…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Gayoso v. Fiat USA (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…1984, in a General Assignment and Assumption Agreement, FAUSA agreed to assume all obligations and liabilities of FNMA defined as the Automobile Business Liabilities (including but not limited to those liabilities listed in Exhibit B to…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · May 19, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…l\]ike a number of other jurisdictions, Ohio follows the general rule that a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn of adjacent parts supplied by a third party, the so-called bare metal defense…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion
Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)
…Tennessee's various statutes of limitations governing products liability actions has created troublesome problems for Tennessee courts in the past two decades. In 1969 the Tennessee Supreme Court in Jackson v. General Motors, 223 Tenn. 12…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Herman v. Abex Corp. (2014)
…either bringing one in or taking one out. Other than that there were times when I wasn't shifting that I would be in that general area, because oftentimes they didn't have enough buses to…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
…908, 911 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Higgs v. General Motors Corp., 655 F. Supp. 22, 23 (E.D.Tenn.1985)) ("\\[I\]t makes no difference whether the complaint is couched in terms of negligence, strict…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion
Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)
…modifications, or alterations; the likely awareness of users of the risks whether that awareness is based on warnings, general knowledge, or otherwise; design compliance with applicable government standards; extent to which labeling conformed to applicable government…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)
…No. 451-13). \[4\] The Court cannot locate in Dr. Compton's consideration of general "asbestos-containing friction materials" any discussion of the causation attributable to Dickens's limited contact with Ford products. (See Dr. Compton…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Epstein v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Corporation is directed to serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on all remaining parties, the Trial Support Clerk located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119), and on the County Clerk…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Ransford v. Griffin Wheel Company, Inc. (2009)
…law damage suits by former railroad workers against a locomotive manufacturer for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos in the manufacturer's products. (Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 471, 474…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…A Manufacturer Owes No General Duty to Warn of Defects in Another Manufacturer's Product. A manufacturer's duty to warn does not extend to hazards arising solely from other products. The decedent in O'Neil…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)
…June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Case v. Clark Indus. Insulation (2018)
…objection instead, and (2) the defense was not available at the time of the response. {¶ 27} JCI inserted general objections to every interrogatory regarding "sales that relate to a period of time, geographical area, or activity…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)
…distribution." Id. at 148. Since Tabert, the court repeatedly has confirmed that as a general rule, strict products liability applies to all persons in the chain of distribution of a product. Macias, 175 Wn.2d at…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Penegar v. United Parcel Service (2018)
…employment with defendant-employer. The preponderance of the evidence in view of the entire record establishes that decedent's work for defendant-employer exposed him to a greater risk of contracting mesothelioma over the general public…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…been tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance. Id. at 593-594, 113…