No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

378 results for “General Electric”, page 12 of 19

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …If the instruction is incomplete or erroneous the trial judge may, as he did here, properly refuse it."'" (Olive v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 804, 813 \[242 Cal.Rptr.3d 15\]…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 11, 2012 · in the opinion

    Gaskill v. Abex Corporation (2012)

    …Defendants-Respondents, and AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., BORG-WARNER CORPORATION c/o Burns International Services Corporation; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, MARTIN CHRYSLER, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR MFG. NORTH AMERICA…

  3. Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · April 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    Riggs v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2013)

    …P.2d 629, 634 (Utah 1995) ("The general rule regarding statutes of limitations is that the limitation period begins to run [\67] when the last event necessary to complete the cause of action occurs."). In other…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · February 14, 2011 · in the opinion

    Garner v. Dii Industries, LLC (2011)

    …few years later, mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer known to cause only one in ten thousand deaths in the general population, was linked to either the mining or industrial use of asbestos.... The link between…

  5. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Roller v. Basic Const. Co. (1989)

    …the time of occurrence of an "injury by accident" is ordinarily obvious. But the General Assembly, realizing that ascertainment of this critical point in time would present great difficulty in the case of the insidious onset…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    … John Crane, Inc.; DAP, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; GAF Corporation; General Refractories Company; Harbison-Walker Refractories Company; Harcros Chemicals, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Thompson-Hayward Chemical Company; Kaiser Refractories, A Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)

    …applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent with his or her assertion in a previous action, if…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · November 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Sason v. Dykes Lumber Co., Inc. (2023)

    …a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)'" (Nemeth v Brenntag N. Am…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Smith v. 3M Company (2019)

    …present during this repair job. (Id.) \[5\] As an exception to the general rule precluding liability for a premises owner who lacks "control of the place and of the work" being conducted on his property, Wilkerson…

  11. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · May 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. (2016)

    …of contract. Whether A.R.S. § 12-341.01(A) applies to the City's claims is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp., 212 Ariz. 18, 26, ¶…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993 · in the opinion

    Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)

    …fishing, woodworking. Mr. Behrendt's pain symptoms eventually led to a diagnosis of mesothelioma in December 1990. He was taken to the Emergency Room at Community General Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, on December 23, 1990 with a…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2014)

    …It then concluded that the only evidence plaintiffs had on causation was Dr. Mark's "general causation" opinion (that exposure to asbestos causes mesothelioma) and that opinion did not "carry the day." On January 29, 2013…

  14. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor. Heard by Mullins, P.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ. BOWER, Judge…

  15. Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · February 16, 1993 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Fenton (1993)

    …their set-off against the total judgment owed by other tortfeasors. Had the General Assembly intended this additional requirement to be met prior to set-off, it simply could have included a provision so requiring in…

  16. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 10, 2017 · in the opinion

    Lepore v. AO Smith Corp. (2017)

    …I. 2004)). Rhode Island Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b) (1) states that, in general, the scope of discovery should be limited to matters "relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action\[.\]" Super. R…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bourke v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2016)

    …56\] In Poche, the court began with the general premise that "\[a\] case that is initially nonremovable may become removable through the voluntary dismissal of nondiverse defendants."\[57\] All but one of the defendants—Eagle, Inc.…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. CertainTeed Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …he used them. (id. at 524:22-527:25). He stated a general belief that the shingles contained asbestos because, essentially, all such products in the industry did at that time (see id. at 533:6…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion

    Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)

    …s expert witness, Dr. Staggs.\[19\] Both experts testify to general and specific causation. Woodward contends that both experts' specific causation opinions are unreliable because they are premised on unreliable facts.\[20\] Second, Woodward moves for…