No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

286 results for “General Electric”, page 12 of 15

  1. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)

    …more widely used terminology in Virginia as well as the terminology used by the circuit court in this case. \[3\] Although the General Assembly later established a discovery rule for asbestos-related diseases based on diagnosis…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)

    …if not all, of the cars he worked on were made by Ford, General Motors or Chrysler. As part of his duties, he used an air compressor to blow the dirt off the outside of the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …Daubert, 509 U.S. at 594-95. In general, the expert's opinion must be based on principles, techniques, or theories that are generally accepted in his or her profession and must reflect something more than…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at p. 566.) This test "is not necessarily foreclosed simply because the product at issue is only in specialized use, so that the general public may not be familiar…

  6. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 23, 1985 · in the opinion

    Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …F Supp 674, fn 4. See also Jackson v Johns-Manville Sales Corp, 727 F2d 506 (CA 5, 1984). In Funk v General Motors Corp, 392 Mich 91, 104; 220 NW2d 641 (1974), the Supreme Court…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …October 14, 2020, Dr. Staggs sets forth the general principles of asbestos-related disease; discusses the studies and reports identifying a causal relationship between asbestos-containing products and diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)

    …The agent stated that Lamorak was "binding the primary general liability program using the \ \ \ SIR." The document supports the [\141] inference that the agent and Kone believed Lamorak had agreed to issue primary insurance subject to…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2012)

    …280 n. 8. Moreover, because mesothelioma, in general, is so rare, "any case occurring after a well attested and substantial asbestos exposure is commonly accepted as being caused by that exposure." Id. at 283 (footnote omitted);…

  10. Mesothelioma

    Pleural Mesothelioma: What It Is, How It's Diagnosed, and How It's Treated

    …in a lawsuit, the significance of a genetic finding depends on the medical evidence and the governing law, including the general rule that a defendant takes an injured person as it finds them. Separately, current ASCO…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion

    Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)

    …to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…

  12. Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)

    …at 799; Prosser, supra at 522. Recent cases typified by Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 575 P.2d 1162, 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 (1978) (ordinary contributory negligence of plaintiff to be considered…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Del Vescovo v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …Judge Rosemary Ledet, Judge Dale N. Atkins, Judge Nakisha Ervin-Knott. DALE N. ATKINS, Judge. This is a Jones Act and general maritime case. Appellants, Maria Assunta del\[1\] Vescovo, Giulia Nasini, Giuliano Nasini, and Maria…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 12, 1985 · in the opinion

    Lee v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    …through 1976 contained asbestos. However, in paragraph 2 of the general objections to those interrogatories, National Gypsum states that it answers those interrogatories "with reference to products that may have been used to insulate pipes, boilers…

  15. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)

    …In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …testimony. Second, with regard to Dr. Brody, Plaintiffs state that he was provided no case-specific materials and offers opinions only as to general causation. (Resp. at 5.) Plaintiffs also allege that Dr. Brody did not…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Brewer v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …manual, which he described as a "Navy document that originated with the manufacturer." These general statements do not constitute evidence that Crane specified or required the use of asbestos in its replacement gaskets and packing. The…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Viglietta v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2022)

    …that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation) (internal citations omitted)" (Nemeth v Brenntag North…

  19. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Werts v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)

    …tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance." Daubert at syllabus; see, also, Miller…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)

    …address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…