291 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 12 of 15
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 10, 2016 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2016)
…conduct performed under color of federal office; and (4) defendant raises a colorable federal defense to plaintiff's claim. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3rd Cir. 1998) (citing Mesa v…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 15, 2023 · in the opinion
Warrington v. 3M Company (2023)
…any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'" Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Smyth v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)
…equity is to supplement the law where it is insufficient, moderating the unjust results that would follow from the unbending application of the law." Discover Bank v. Owens, 129 Ohio Misc.2d 71, 2004-Ohio-7333…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · May 14, 1999 · in the opinion
Spoonamore v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1999)
…to evidence that links a John Crane product to Mr. Spoonamore's illness. Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1433 (7th Cir.1996). In order to withstand a motion for summary judgment…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion
Rabatin v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)
…Brief at 14. Rabatin does not direct us to any Pennsylvania authority in support of this argument, but does cite to one case from a Florida appellate court, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Corcoran, 679 So…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)
… Brightwater; and Owens-Corning Fiberglass. Lorillard contested DeLisle's use of Kent cigarettes. DeLisle testified that he smoked on average a pack of Kent cigarettes a day from junior high school until he enlisted in the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion
King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…upon a fair interpretation of the evidence that no valid line of reasoning or set of permissible inferences exist that would permit the jurors to arrive at the verdict reached." (Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)
…has suffered damages; and, 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich.1989); Stark…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…from 1957 to 1958, where he was exposed to rolls of asbestos insulation and asbestos pipe covering. Owens Corning Fiberglass sold the insulation to the Babcock facility while Glenn worked there. The insulation, known as "Kaylo…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Chevron Oronite Company v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2019)
…3d 1101 (La. App. 2017) ($750,000 to each adult child of 59-year-old deceased mother); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 878 So. 2d 631 (La. App. 2004) ($250,000 to each adult child…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…identify "a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433A(1) (1965); see Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion
Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…