No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

292 results for “General Electric”, page 13 of 15

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Whitlock v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2008)

    …Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 859 \["\[A\]s a general matter, orders granting a new trial are examined for abuse of discretion."\].) (Italics added.) Further, as "\[t\]he standard for review of an…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)

    …or 1975. Again, Ay's general testimony that manufacturers, including Foster Wheeler, specified the use of asbestos insulation up until 1971 does not lead to a reasonable inference that asbestos was specified by Foster Wheeler at…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (2017)

    …an employee of Shell and he performed work under Shell's direct and unfettered control. Beckering further argued that application of the Rowland factors did not support an exception to the general duty of reasonable care…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 2, 1982 · in the opinion

    Baptist v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1982)

    …examination, and his exclusive reliance on the Selikoff study. The latter study concluded that among 17,800 members of the general public 17.5 cases of death from pancreatic cancer could be expected. Among asbestos workers…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Boyd v. Super. CT. OF Alameda County (2014)

    …severity despite intervening pain medications and treatment, and will result in loss of mobility and general disability." His cancer is currently in stage III (out of 4 possible stages). Individuals at stage III can deteriorate very…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)

    …Benicia refinery in a way that affirmatively contributed to Ronald's injuries: at best, the evidence establishes that Exxon exercised general supervision over the work of the independent contractors for whom Ronald worked. See Hooker v…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    Hopkins v. Plant Insulation Company (2006)

    …at 1079. Like federal habeas law, federal bankruptcy law creates exceptions to the general rule of federal deference to state court judgments by empowering bankruptcy courts to avoid or modify state judgments. Id. For certain bankruptcy…

  9. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Chevron USA, Inc. v. Wcab (1999)

    …health and safety and general welfare of any and all workers and those dependent upon them for support to the extent of relieving from the consequences of any injury or death incurred or sustained by workers…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)

    …other grounds. \[4\] The evidence showed that Mr. Murat was in charge of Port Welding; Port Welding was the general contractor on each job; Port Welding supplied its own tools, but used the ship's gaskets…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …its employees in the construction and service departments working with asbestos, it is not reasonable to infer from the company's general safety consciousness alone, that it is highly probable that the company was aware of…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …in sanding the tiles. Also, there was no evidence of a general nature. There was no evidence as to what type of tiles would have been used in Iran 35 years ago. There was no evidence…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …Co., 44 Cal. 2d 785, 788-90 (1955), "active control" does not include the owner's exercise of "a broad general power of supervision and control. . . so as to insure satisfactory performance," see id. at 790…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 4, 2011 · in the opinion

    Belvedere v. GS Blodgett Corporation (2011)

    …." "The general rule is that an amended complaint that adds a new defendant does not relate back to the date of filing the original complaint and the statute of limitations is applied as of the date…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kramer v. Amcord Inc. (2020)

    …testified that gem and diamond cutter was an alternative title under the general "stonecutter" category and, further, that a vocational rehabilitation expert had confirmed that the general "stonecutter" category was in fact the correct one for…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 1996 · in the opinion

    Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (1996)

    …two statutes, a court must construe the statutes in the context of the entire statutory system of which they are a part in order to achieve harmony with other statutes on the same general subject. This…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …state that he saw OCF's name on Kaylo boxes at the shipyard. But the questioning reverted back to general product trade names, and Durham was asked the time period that Kaylo products were customarily used…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)

    …pp. 371-372.) There is insufficient basis for deviating from this general rule in the current posture of this case, particularly where to do so would require the taking of evidence. \[4\] Congoleum also appeals from…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)

    … 2778, subds. 3 & 4.) "\[Civil Code\] section 2778, unchanged since 1872, sets forth general rules for the interpretation of indemnity contracts, \unless a contrary intention appears.' If not forbidden by other, more specific, statutes, the obligations…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …28, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 518.) Section 361 Requires Application of Indiana Law In general, whether a claim is barred by a statute of limitations "is a procedural matter governed by the law of the forum…