425 results for “General Electric”, page 13 of 22
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 1, 2019
Matter of Marzigliano v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2019)
…judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiffs' proof; it must make a prima facie showing…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 1, 2019
Carlstrand v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…dismiss plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert reports on whether chrysotile…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 13, 1983 · in the opinion
American Home Prod. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (1983)
…700 F.2d 836, 842 (2d Cir.1983) (rejecting plaintiff's request for general ruling on government's liability for asbestos exposure, although recognizing "staggering" costs of ordering thousands of individual actions). \[7\] The CGL was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Peterson v. Vanderbilt Minerals (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…Defendant argues that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation and there is no basis to sustain the cause of action for punitive damages. To prevail on a…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 20, 1990 · in the opinion
Grispo v. Eagle-Picher Indus. (In re Joint E. & S. Dist. New York Asbestos Lit., 1990)
682, § 4, which was enacted after Casabianca and which extended the limitations period for persons injured by asbestos, and found a general legislative disposition favoring compensation of victims of asbestos exposure. This aim, the court reasoned…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 16, 2019
Rosen v. Fisher Scientific Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…prima facie showing that its product did not contribute to the disease; conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation under Parker and Cornell raises fact issues that cannot be resolved on papers. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 21, 2019
Hernandez v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing that its product could not have contributed to the illness, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2011
Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assocs. (2011)
…defendant, not for later exposure as an employee of a different employer. Whether a general contractor controlled the work site is a fact question that can defeat summary judgment. Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 8, 2019
Young v. Avon Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…asbestos case by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues for trial. New York does not recognize an independent cause of action for…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…which the court held control asbestos cases, plaintiffs must offer expert proof of general causation and a scientific expression of the plaintiff's exposure to the defendant's product. An unquantified 'cumulative exposure' opinion and proof…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2008
Barnes v. AO Smith Water Products Co. (2008)
…the Montross, Perdicaro, Enea and Iqbal cases separate, over the defendants' general opposition. Under CPLR 602(a), actions with common questions of law or fact may be tried jointly. The Malcolm factors guide the choice, and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 23, 2005 · in the opinion
IN the Matter of Cammarata v. Caldwell & Cook, Inc. (2005)
…Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria L.L.P., Buffalo (John A. Collins of counsel), for Sheila Cammarata, respondent. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Estelle Kraushar of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent. Before: Spain, J.P., Carpinello…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 22, 2001 · in the opinion
Crawford v. Artuz (2001)
…Naponoch, NY, Plaintiff Pro se. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York by Michael J. Keane, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, New York City, for Defendants. OPINION CHIN, District Judge. Pro se plaintiffs Clifton…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 14, 2023 · in the opinion
Matter of Reid v. National Grid (2023)
…December 17, 2021. Wolff, Goodrich & Goldman, LLP, Syracuse (Alicia M. Blair of counsel), for appellants. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for respondent. Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Ceresia, Fisher…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · January 23, 1984 · in the opinion
In re Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)
…at 356 (citations omitted). Thus, the fixation of the point from which to date a statute of limitations includes an assessment of the general need for repose against the need for redress of injury. In contrast…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 24, 1989 · in the opinion
Kaufman v. City of New York (1989)
…the DOB. The protection offered by the legislative process satisfies the requirements of procedural due process when the legislature enacts a law, or an agency promulgates a rule, affecting a general class. See, e.g., J…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)
…pay "all sums" up to the policy limit, which the insured shall become liable to pay as damages, and not just for damages that occur during the policy period (Aerojet-General Corp. v Transport Indem. Co.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 3, 2020 · in the opinion
Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. Alstom SA (2020)
…contacts with New York, Elodie relies most heavily on Alstom's website's statement that its "U.S. Headquarters" are in New York to argue that Alstom is subject to general jurisdiction here. See Pl. Mem…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2012)
…June 2, 2011. \[3\] 21 U.S.C.A. § 379s, entitled "Preemption for labeling or packaging of cosmetics," provides: (a) In general. Except as provided in subsection (b), (d), or (e) of this section, no State…