No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

434 results for “General Electric”, page 13 of 22

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Saunders v. HK Porter Co., Inc. (1986)

    …concerns over admiralty law's preemption of "state regulation of matters traditionally within the ambit of local control," 764 F.2d at 227. Tort law in general, including the statutes of limitation applicable in tort cases…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 22, 1986 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)

    …they have already been punished enough. They stated to the trial judge that punitive damages serve to motivate "private attorneys general" to bring suit, but argued that persons injured by asbestos have motivation enough to sue…

  3. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Boyd v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (2016)

    …Franklin County, No. 14AP-413, 2015-Ohio-2352. Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Patsy A. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., and…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Qunicel v. Indus. Comm. (2012)

    …Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, and Chelsea J. Fulton, for relator. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP…

  5. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2017)

    …chemicals. Id. at 692. Each employee had previously executed a general release in the course of settling unrelated FELA claims. Id. These releases "appeared to settle all claims for all injuries past and future." Id. In…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · January 11, 1982 · in the opinion

    Bertrand v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …discretion to determine when it should be applied. The general rule should be that in cases where a plaintiff could easily have joined in the earlier action or where, either for the reasons discussed above or…

  7. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)

    …American Home Assurance Company (American Home) seeks declaratory relief to determine its rights and obligations under a general liability insurance policy issued to defendant The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the Port Authority…

  9. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Boyd v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (2015)

    …Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, and Robert A. Minor, for respondent The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Patsy A. Thomas, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. DECISION TYACK, J. {¶ 1} Robert Boyd…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 23, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hoerner v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2002)

    …indicates that Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. issued a primary commercial general liability policy to Eagle during each of the one-year periods when Home Insurance issued the excess policy. The personal injury limit for the…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Trust (1992)

    …that would include fibrosis of the lungs. Plaintiffs do not contend the answers to the special interrogatories are inconsistent with the general verdicts as to Deitz and Lehr. The language employed is not ambiguous or confusing…

  12. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 29, 1981 · in the opinion

    Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1981)

    …0 \ \ 0-9 \ 346 \ 89.6 \ 10.4 \ 36 \ 0 \ 0 \ \ ----------\ -------\ --------\ ----------\ ------\ ------\ ------\ \ Total \ 1,117 \ 51.5 \ 48.5 \ 366 \ 126 \ 50 \ The general purpose of a statute of limitations is to encourage prompt resolution of claims…

  13. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)

    …allow an expansion of a statute of limitations period when the change is made before the cause of action is barred by the prior statutory limitation period. Corbett v. General Engineering & Machinery Co., 160 Fla. 879…

  14. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 14, 2000 · in the opinion

    Heard v. Conrad (2000)

    …Douglas Ames, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Robert J. Marek, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Bureau of Workers' Compensation and Industrial Commission of Ohio. Jerome Webbs, for appellee Eichleay Corporation. WAITE, Judge. This…

  15. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)

    …City of Austin, in which the Texas Supreme Court explained, The general rule is that when a statute is repealed without a savings clause limiting the effect of the repeal, the repeal of that statute is…

  16. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 14, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Ethyl Corp. (1998)

    …184, 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995); see also Friendly, Federal Jurisdiction: A General View 120 (1973) (condemning "blackmail settlements"), quoted in In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc., 51 F.3d at 1298. On the other…

  17. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2003 · in the opinion

    State ex rel. Hiatt v. Indus. Comm. (2003)

    …L.P.A., and W. Smith Hammelrath, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Gary E. Becker and Brian…

  18. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)

    …Liability. The ALI drafting committee and general members of the ALI approved the substance of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (with the exception of two comments not relevant here) in 2005. The…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …of the same danger. This inconsistency in the jury's verdicts, although puzzling, need not detain us. It has long been the rule that consistency in general verdicts is not required. Dunn v. United States, 1932…