378 results for “General Electric”, page 13 of 19
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · March 31, 2025 · in the opinion
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. (2025)
…such determinations should be driven by the contract language—language that obviously may vary from policy to policy." Id. at 30. That caveat accords with the general rule that "\[i\]nsurance policies are written contracts, and…
-
Court case · Kansas Supreme Court · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Harding v. KC Wall Products, Inc. (1992)
…the time the action was filed applies. It is a well-settled rule of law that "statutes complete in themselves, relating to a specific thing, take precedence over general statutes." Szoboszlay v. Glessner, 233 Kan. 475…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion
H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)
…on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Colvin v. Eaton Corporation (2019)
…in which the party responds but the response is incomplete or otherwise objectionable. Rules Commentary at 436-37.\[3\] As a general matter, the first step in obtaining a judicial resolution of a discovery dispute is…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · February 17, 1993 · in the opinion
Beeman v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Fund (1993)
…convincing, and satisfactory evidence. Iowa Code § 668A.1. Beeman apparently agrees that punitive damages may not be assessed against Keene based on the general knowledge of the asbestos industry. Instead, there must be clear, convincing, and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…
-
Court case · Mississippi Court of Appeals · July 18, 2006 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Stone Architecture (2006)
…Dr. Lorino repeatedly referred to "the literature" and "studies" in general. Courts are not required to "admit opinion evidence that is connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert," because self-proclaimed…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)
…approach a situation to which the term judicial estoppel is applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion
Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)
…jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 6, 2018 · in the opinion
Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. v. Rossello (2018)
…defendants; January 4, 2016 was the deadline for the plaintiff to name his "most likely to use" general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have been previously deposed; January 18, 2016…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 25, 2008 · in the opinion
Lapointe v. 3M Company (2008)
…1126 (R.I. 2001) (citations omitted); Volino v. General Dynamics, 539 A.2d 531, 532-533 (R.I 1988). It is well-settled that a genuine issue of material fact is one about which reasonable minds…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion
Murphy v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (2016)
…with a motion and proposed order to have the exceptions set for hearing, in state court. In general, "\[a\] waiver of the right to remove must be clear and unequivocal." Furthermore, as explained in Bourdier v…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion
Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…a "less desirable longshoreman" in the future. Id. at 668. Bonura is inapposite to the case at bar. Bonura was decided under general maritime law, not Louisiana law. Furthermore, the instant record does not support an…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Pogacnik v. AO Smith Water Products Co. (2018)
…summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims, maintaining that the evidence establishes the absence of a general or specific causal relationship between Mannington Mills's sheet flooring and Pogacnik's mesothelioma. Mannington Mills presents affidavits incorporating reports…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 6, 1992 · in the opinion
Tragarz v. Keene Corp. (1992)
…was diagnosed as suffering from malignant pleural mesothelioma, a cancer that is extremely rare among the general population but not as rare among those occupationally exposed to asbestos fibers. Expert testimony in this case indicated that…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)
…(Owens); (2) distributors including Thorpe Insulation Company (Thorpe) and Bell Industries, Inc. (Bell),\[1\] and (3) general contractors including Holmes and Narver, Inc. (Holmes). The Garcias proceeded to trial against just two defendants, Duro Dyne and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…and loss of consortium based on asbestos exposure. Appellants sought general and punitive damages against two groups of defendants: those that allegedly exposed Mrs. Gibbons and her family to asbestos through construction work\[2\] and the…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · April 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2022)
…plaintiff's evidence (see majority op at 344-347). To the extent the majority suggests there was a lack of any evidence of general causation, such a suggestion is unsupportable as there was an abundance of…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Vantosh v. 3M Co. (2014)
…fact that it was silicone, had some properties, dangerous properties. Q. So this is general information you received at the end of your career that silicone, in general, may have contained asbestos. Is that correct? A…