No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

286 results for “General Electric”, page 13 of 15

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …tested; whether it has been the subject of peer review; whether the theory has a known or potential error rate; and whether the theory has gained general acceptance in the scientific community. Daubert, 509 U.S…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018 · in the opinion

    Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · August 25, 2015 · in the opinion

    Laux v. Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd. (2015)

    …JCOFS, Inc. was not a voluntary act of Plaintiff, the case was not properly removable. See Self v. General Motors Corp., 588 F.2d 655, 658 (9th Cir. 1978) (articulating the "voluntary-involuntary" rule). In response…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · June 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …Dr. Dikman testified that the general population is exposed to asbestos in the ambient air.\[16\] Dr. Dikman clarified that "the measurements in the air samples in the general population, and air samples have been used…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    … 388 (1965), observing that the section had previously been adopted as a general principle in the duty to warn area by previous Maryland cases. Section 388 states as follows: Chattel Known to Be Dangerous for Intended…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)

    …nature, but novel or of questionable reliability, it is necessary for the trial court to consider whether the "methodology that underlies the evidence has "general acceptance in the relevant scientific community." Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …No. 20\]. The same analysis is true for the Plaintiffs' claims based on the duty to warn. As the Fourth Circuit explained in Baughman v. General Motors Corporation, 780 F.2d 1131, 1132-33 (4th Cir…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …first action may expressly reserve plaintiff's right to maintain second action). \[35\] Johns-Manville has catalogued an impressive array of court decisions exemplifying the general res judicata rule against splitting an indivisible cause of action…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · June 26, 1985 · in the opinion

    Shuman v. United States (1985)

    …at 2674, we believe that the Court's unanimous opinion in Varig Airlines signaled that a more uniform and linear approach was to be utilized henceforth. Accord General Public Utilities Corporation v. United States, 745 F…

  11. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)

    …the Mono caulk. While working with decedent, they worked in locations where insulators were present and wrapping pipes in their vicinity or general area. Schultz did not know if the insulators created any dust. Darr testified…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 7, 1981 · in the opinion

    Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    …does not apply to cases already filed before the amendment was enacted. Section 28 of the Ohio Constitution states that the "general assembly shall have no power to pass retroactive laws, ..." Section 1.58(A)(1…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 10, 2022 · in the opinion

    Katechis v. Allied Bldg. Prods. Corp. (2022)

    …exposure to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation). Where we depart…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    O'connor v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (2007)

    …behalf. (Compl. ¶¶ 5-6, 8, 11-15.) These general allegations of injury, suffice at this early stage of the litigation. See White Tail Park, 413 F.3d at 459 (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 1996 · in the opinion

    Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (1996)

    …two statutes, a court must construe the statutes in the context of the entire statutory system of which they are a part in order to achieve harmony with other statutes on the same general subject. This…

  17. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 4, 2001 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2001)

    …course, the general principle is that statutes enacted after the acquisition of a vested property right cannot be applied retroactively so as to divest the plaintiff of his cause of action without violating due process guarantees…

  18. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · August 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Wood v. Harry Harmon Insulation (1987)

    …usual occupations; (4) if the disease is an ordinary disease of life, the incidence of such a disease must be substantially higher in the particular occupation than in the general public. Hamilton v. Stamas Yachts, 496…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)

    …appellant presented Richard Lemen, Ph.D., an epidemiologist, former assistant surgeon general of the United States, and former deputy [\666] director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Dr. Lemen described epidemiology as…

  20. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)

    …225] The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio acts as an exception to the general rules of prescription by suspending the running of prescription when the circumstances of the case fall into one…