376 results for “General Electric”, page 13 of 19
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Court must consider whether Oneal's claims are governed by federal admiralty law or by state law. In general, admiralty law applies to a tort action when the alleged tort occurred on navigable waters and the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)
…upon by Captain Moore extend to JCI because Captain Moore testified that "these documents are instructive for the general purpose of determining what the Navy's attitude towards warnings was at any particular point in time.…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)
…Constitution, which states: To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)
…must adduce sufficient evidence to support every essential element of a claim to make a submissible case). The general test for proximate cause is whether an injury is "a reasonable and probable consequence" of a defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…t is \[\] unfair to require manufacturers of nondefective products to shoulder a burden of liability when they derived no economic benefit from the sale of the products that injured the plaintiff").\[16\] As a general matter…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…If the instruction is incomplete or erroneous the trial judge may, as he did here, properly refuse it."'" (Olive v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 804, 813 \[242 Cal.Rptr.3d 15\]…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Davis v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…user defense, the ordinary users would have been Davis's employers, not Davis. As support, appellants cite Maneely v. General Motors Corp. (9th Cir. 1997) 108 F.3d 1176. In Maneely, applying California law, the court…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 2020
Cancer incidence among seafarers and fishermen in the Nordic countries
…the seafarers. Conclusion In our cohort, seafaring was associated with a higher overall incidence of cancer compared to the general population. While the majority of cancers could not be linked to specific occupational factors, increases in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Gemaehlich v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…and GRANTS the Gemaehlichs' motion to remand. "It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…. ." \[Doc. \#333-1, at 18-19\]. \[2\] Hovsepian claimed breach of warranty under Massachusetts General Laws ch. 106, § 2-318. He argued that "the defendants expressly and impliedly warranted that the asbestos and asbestoscontaining products and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Grande v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2014)
…false representation; (4) intentional tort/intentional failure to warn; (5) premises/contractor liability; (6) general negligence; and (7) vicarious liability. (Id.) Plaintiff has since dismissed a number of Defendants from the above-captioned matter. Only Plaintiff…
-
Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · February 14, 2013 · in the opinion
Whiting v. CBS Corporation (2013)
…by asbestos products manufactured or later supplied by the defendants, and have shown that the plaintiff \has no reasonable expectation of proving an essential element of \[her\] case.' Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp., 410 Mass. 706…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)
…unable to conclude that the jury's verdict was based on a finding of negligent failure to warn because the special verdict form is inconsistent.\[5\] [\715] The jury was given general negligence instructions BAJI Nos…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 14, 2013 · in the opinion
Tobin v. Aerco Intl. (2013)
…a seaman, Mr. Tobin stood watch on the bridge and deck, painted, and performed general repairs. He also visited the ship's engine room below deck where his coworkers performed work on pipes, valves, pumps, turbines…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)
…emotional distress, intentional tort, conspiracy [\389] and loss of consortium; and sought general, special and punitive damages against no fewer than 215 named defendants and 300 unnamed does. Specifically, the complaint alleged that as a result…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Lund v. 3M Company (2013)
…Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…