291 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 13 of 15
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · August 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…a second tortfeasor's actions must \be an independent force which entirely supersedes the original action and renders its effect in the chain of causation remote.'" Jackson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 62 F.3d 1414…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…determination. It is noted, that in New York, injury occurs when plaintiff is exposed to asbestos. (see Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 (1997); Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litig. \[Chrabas\], 273…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 27, 2011 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co. (2011)
…employed there. Accordingly, we disagree that it qualifies as a written admission. {¶ 42} Fisher's estate also attached several invoices from Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, purporting to show that Clark distributed asbestos products, specifically, Kaylo pipe…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 27, 2016 · in the opinion
DeMartino v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Grace & Co.-Conn, 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion
Holdampf v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2004)
…the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the defendants based their appellate argument on the Widera rationale that an employer owes no duty of care to non-employees for injuries occurring off-premises (id. at 752)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016
Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)
…and Goulds Pumps, ending the plaintiff's claims over Owen Holland's mesothelioma death. Under Alabama law a plaintiff must first prove exposure to an asbestos-containing product for which the defendant is responsible. Evidence that…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 4, 2023
Shellenberger v. Kreider Farms (2023)
…Superior Court reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for Kreider Farms (the employers) and remanded for further proceedings, in favor of the Shellenberger estate. An employer owes an employee, as a business invitee…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 26, 2015
Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…because of disputed facts. Under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for, and owes no duty to warn about, asbestos-containing parts it did not manufacture or supply, and a plaintiff must show exposure to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 24, 2015
Shearer v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)
…which governed work aboard a dry-docked Navy ship, a manufacturer owes no duty to warn about asbestos products it neither made nor distributed, so a turbine maker is not liable for insulation applied after the…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017
Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)
…testimony about shared work on the valves, and the maker owes a duty to warn and to design safely where its valves required or specified asbestos gaskets and packing. Missouri's statutory cap on punitive damages…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)
…Vice, Vinson Law, PA, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiffs. Brian J. Schneider, Spotts Fain PC, Richmond, VA, Christopher Owen Massenburg, Manning Gross and Massenburg LLP, New Orleans, LA, Jonathan F. Tabasky, Megan K. Sullivan, Stephanie M. Batchelder…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…above, the Conner court relied heavily on the Lindstrom decision in concluding that a manufacturer owes no duty to warn with respect to "asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." See Conner, 842…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015 · in the opinion
Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)
…airworthiness status of an aircraft. (ECF Nos. 111-3 through 111-5, ¶ 5.) He explains that "Boeing owns or controls all manufacturing specifications for all Boeing aircraft\[,\]" (ECF No. 111-3, ¶ 6), and provides similar statements…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)
…to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…