No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 14 of 37

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …REILLY, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT, PC, STEPHEN SCOTT, REILLY MCDEVITT & HENRICH & SUSAN M. VALINIS, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT P.C. FORD MOTOR CO., Defendant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE, ECKERT…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2019)

    …mentioning. The product manufacturer (1) "has the knowledge and ability to warn of the dangers of the joint use of the products, especially if the other company's product is a \wear item,'" id. at 472…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)

    …Scientific Corp., 252 F.3d 1253, 1255 (11th Cir. 2001) (quoting McCants v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855, 856-57 (11th Cir. 1986) (emphasis in McCants). The critical question is whether dismissal would cause…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)

    …2019 WL 2150949, at [\6] (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2019) (emphasis in original) (citation omitted); see also Pierson v. Ford Motor Co., 2008 WL 7074289, at [\2] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008). The Court…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (2017)

    …she laundered. In our prior decision in this matter (Beckering v. Shell Oil Company (Nov. 21, 2014, B256407) \[nonpub. opn.\] (Beckering I)), guided by Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell)…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)

    …applying Maryland law and finding no duty); In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Court of Appeals of Texas (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 740 N.W.2d 206, 218 (Mich. 2007) (applying Michigan law and…

  7. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Franklin (2009)

    …jury trial was held against Vanderbilt and three remaining defendants, General Motors, Ford Motor, and Pneumo Abex. General Motors and Pneumo Abex settled during the trial. The jury assessed damages of $5,200,000 and allocated…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 21, 2015 · in the opinion

    Kochera v. General Electric Company (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Adkins (2020)

    …defendant where their claims and prayer align them with the defendant and pit them directly against the plaintiff, even if no parties assert claims against them." In re Ford Motor Co., 442 S.W.3d 265…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …v. A-C Prods. Liab. Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492-93 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378, at [\1]-3 (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2014)…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

    …product caused his harm, from those in which such likelihood is absent on account of only casual or minimal exposure to the defendant's product." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) …

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion

    Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)

    …9\]. . . . In addition, there are some cases where the combination of two sound products creates a dangerous condition, and both manufacturers have a duty to warn. \[Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App. 1, 34…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2016)

    …in this district recognize that "\[f\]raud by silence. . . \is, by its very nature, difficult to plead with particularity.'" In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litig., No. 1063, 1997 WL 539665, at [\3] (E.D…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · May 6, 2022 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2022)

    …core issue in Ford. Because Brake Supply cannot show that Fras-Le purposefully availed itself of Kentucky, however, the Court does not reach this argument. Similarly, Fras-Le contends that haling a foreign company into court…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

    …a Viacom, Inc. f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Certain Teed Corp.; Crown Cork & Seal Co.; Dana Corp.; Deere & Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Dynamics Corp.; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific, LLC;…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · November 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Little v. Budd Company (2018)

    …the total dose" which "is an \irrefutable scientific fact,' and it is \well-established' that the threshold level for developing mesothelioma is unknown." Id. (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa…

  17. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Genuine Parts Company v. Cepec (2016)

    …half of all U.S. publicly traded companies and 65% of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware."). \[111\] Daimler, 134 S. Ct. at 761. \[112\] See, e.g., Pitts v. Ford Motor Co., 127 F…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Company (2024)

    …present purposes. Generally speaking, motions in limine are used to preclude the presentation of evidence that a party considers inadmissible or prejudicial. See Parr v. Ford Motor Co., 109 A.3d 682, 690 (Pa. Super. 2014…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2018)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2013)

    …63; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262-263.) Strict liability is justified as a means to spread the costs of injuries resulting from dangerous and defective products among the products' manufacturers…