292 results for “General Electric”, page 14 of 15
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion
Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)
…booster pumps, the bilge pumps, and fire and flushing pumps. Cunningham would have had technical manuals for such products available. In general, the manufacturers would provide their equipment to the shipyard, which would assemble, install, and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion
Leidig v. Zenith Electronics LLC (2015)
…the testimony of Bob Darby, an engineer who had met decedent at General Motors Defense Research Lab (GM) in the 1960's and who claimed to have seen decedent work on radios and televisions, including Zeniths…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Harris v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc. (2019)
…room or in boilers may have contained asbestos, and even accepting that it was Triple A's general practice to remove such materials in ways generating respirable dust and fibers, Plaintiffs' discovery responses are devoid of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)
…appellant presented Richard Lemen, Ph.D., an epidemiologist, former assistant surgeon general of the United States, and former deputy [\666] director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Dr. Lemen described epidemiology as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…concerning the character or quality of the chattel in question," and "does not apply to statements of opinion," "loose general praise," "sales talk," or "puffing." These requirements and limitations suggest that the misrepresentation must be affirmative…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 14, 2023 · in the opinion
Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2023)
…further noting that the Joint Stipulation renders Defendant's Supplement to Notice of Removal moot). I. LEGAL STANDARD In general, "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion
McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)
…summary judgment was reversed on appeal. In Scheiding, a general contractor defendant supported its summary judgment motion with a declaration from counsel stating that the plaintiff did not mention the defendant in discovery. (Id. at p…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…litigant to rely on abstract generalities, but must instruct in specific terms that relate the party's [\1088] theory to the particular case." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 572 \[34 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…specialist in occupational medicine called by Quarles, testified not about any specific facts of this case, but about the evolving general state of knowledge in medicine, science and industry, and about the dangers of asbestos in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION A. Motion to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 22, 2007 · in the opinion
Ballenger v. Agco Corporation (2007)
…S. 423 (1999), It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit. To…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railroad Co. (2012)
…as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos products manufactured by the defendants. The action ended in a general verdict for the defendants. The wrongful death action brought by Evans's heirs also alleged that Evans…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Dr. Stockman is…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Handley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2009)
…purpose of judicial construction of a statute is to determine the meaning that comports most closely with the intent of the Legislature "\with the view to promoting rather than defeating the general purpose of the statute…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…the studies and other information cited by experts adequately support the conclusion that the expert's general theory or technique is valid.' \[Citation.\] The goal of trial court gatekeeping is simply to exclude \clearly invalid and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion
Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)
…d\] that Soco West, Inc. is not subject to jurisdiction in the State of Washington." Plant Insulation Company presented a declaration from its general counsel. Based upon his personal knowledge, he averred that the company was…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 1994 · in the opinion
Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co. (1994)
…The proceedings here had not reached that stage when Wash Williamson died. (4) "The general rule is that \courts have inherent power to enter judgments nunc pro tunc so as to relate back to the time…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…Corp. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1222, 1231 (Casey).) In Casey, the plaintiff accused the defendant, a general contractor, of exposing him to asbestos at jobsites where the plaintiff worked for a subcontractor. (Id. at p…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…Rptr. 456 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Consistent with this general rule, the California Supreme Court held in Rutherford that an asbestos personal injury plaintiff need not prove with certainty that the defendant's product…