378 results for “General Electric”, page 14 of 19
-
Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · November 15, 1996 · in the opinion
Marlin v. Bill Rich Const., Inc. (1996)
…Va.Code § 29-12A-5(a)(5) stated the common-law rule that a cause of action is not recognized for the breach of a general duty owed the public as a whole. Randall then recognized…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Carlson v. 84 Lumber Company (2011)
…fourth specific torts factor is not useful to this Court's choice of law analysis. 2 Application of General Interest-Weighing Factors The choice of law analysis may not always turn on the quantity of contacts…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Case v. Clark Indus. Insulation (2018)
…objection instead, and (2) the defense was not available at the time of the response. {¶ 27} JCI inserted general objections to every interrogatory regarding "sales that relate to a period of time, geographical area, or activity…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…been tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance. Id. at 593-594, 113…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…4th 413, 424 (Wysinger).) However, "\[w\]ith a special verdict, unlike a general verdict or a general verdict with special findings, a reviewing court will not infer findings to support the verdict." (Singh, at p. 358…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 6, 2006 · in the opinion
Lyons v. Chinese Hospital Association (2006)
…to airborne asbestos. Lyons produced evidence that the release of asbestos occurred directly adjacent to the hospital lobby, in which CHA employees worked and members of the general public congregated, and through which patients, employees and…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)
…fiber that began or caused the process that resulted in mesothelioma, but that asbestos fiber in general is the only known cause of the disease. Dr. Maddox also testified that mesothelioma results from an individual's…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2014 · in the opinion
Williams v. Georgia-Pacific (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2014)
…App. at 160. Baxley submitted as evidence testimony from Oliver E. Burch, former General Sales Manager for Georgia-Pacific's Gypsum Division, which was apparently given in a deposition for a separate lawsuit. Burch stated that…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 2017 · in the opinion
Startley v. Welco Mfg. Co. (2017)
…¶ 38 Choice of Law ¶ 39 In general, "the local law of the State where the injury occurred should determine the rights and liabilities of the parties, unless \[another state\] has a more significant relationship with the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…awards for wrongful death and pain and suffering deviate materially from reasonable compensation. C — After remitting the verdict, the jury's award must be reduced by offsets pursuant to General Obligations Law § 15-108. These errors…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 23, 2020 · in the opinion
1Up Floors, LLC v. Department of Labor & Industries (2020)
…975 Carpenter Rd Ne Ste 204, Lacey, WA, 98516-5560, Counsel for Appellant(s). Valerie Kay Balch, Office of the Attorney General, 800 Fifth Ave Ste 2000, Seattle, WA, 98104-3188, Seattle Labor & Industries A.g…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 9, 2018 · in the opinion
Swanson v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Plaintiffs' Complaint and all cross-claims against it. Amtico contends that Plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion establishing general and specific causation that Amtico floor tiles caused Mr. Swanson's mesothelioma. Plaintiffs oppose the motion…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion
DePriest v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…Here, the evidence that plaintiffs' medical experts intend to submit has the potential to sufficiently establish a general connection between asbestos and mesothelioma, as well as a scientific expression of plaintiffs' exposure levels based on Stagnito…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Southern Wall Products v. Bolin (2018)
…fairness divorced from traditional practice cannot transform a judgment rendered in the absence of authority into law. As a general rule, the sovereign's exercise of power requires some act by which the defendant "purposefully avails…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · June 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Union Bank OF California, NA v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc. (2007)
…Corp., Bendix Home Systems, Allied Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation, Honeywell, Inc., Honeywell Controls, General Chemical Corporation, FRAM, Friction Materials of Los Angeles, EM Sector Holdings, Inc., Universal Oil Products Company, Boylston Corporation, Ehrhart & Associates, Inc., Ehrhart…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Covil Corporation (2011)
…erred by failing to apply the average weekly wages in conjunction with section 97-38. "\\[I\]n discerning the intent of the General Assembly, statutes in pari materia should be construed together and harmonized whenever possible.'…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)
…Waterloo, for appellees. [\62] Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-appellee. [\61] CADY, Chief Justice. In this case, we are called upon to review numerous issues that arose…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · May 7, 1987 · in the opinion
DeStories v. City of Phoenix (1987)
…§ 54 at 361, 363. Only a handful of courts have permitted a general negligence claim for infliction of serious emotional distress absent physical injury or illness. Id., at 364-65. Arizona adheres to the majority rule…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC (2015)
…factual support for elements essential to the plaintiffs' negligence and strict liability claims. Even considering the general duty owed by premises owners, Jordan's deposition does not address or provide factual support to show that PCC…