376 results for “General Electric”, page 14 of 19
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · June 21, 1995 · in the opinion
Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motor., Inc. (1995)
…intact. The dissent does not claim that the amendments changed the last injurious exposure rule enunciated in Meyer and Fossum. Instead, it attempts to assess the legislature's general intent. 135 Or.App. at 84. A…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)
…the Supreme Court explained: It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…claims specifically—the claims at issue here. (Dkt. No. 139 at 13.) Thus, Plaintiffs fail to establish that the relief sought has been historically available under general maritime law. See Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., No…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 5, 1985 · in the opinion
Meehan v. Celotex Corp. (1985)
…of the negligent act. Indeed, as Gaboury itself says: "In determining the proper forum in which to bring suit under the general statute fixing venue where the cause of action \arose', or \accrued', the \injury occurred…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Atchley v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. (2018)
…part, as follows: Once LA-contaminated soil is removed from properties \[in Libby\], various types of fill materials are used to backfill excavated areas. In general, fill materials consist of topsoil and topsoil amendments, common fill…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · March 31, 2016 · in the opinion
McINDOE v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2016)
…death. McIndoe's heirs raised design, manufacture, and failure-to-warn claims based on theories of both strict products liability and general negligence. The case was removed to federal district court under 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2023 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2023)
…engaged in the "ripout" or "tearout" of asbestos. The government fails to cite any authority for this proposition. It points to general studies, but does not demonstrate that Mr. Perkins did not "ripout" or "tearout" asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…Salisbury, 2014 WL 345214, at [\8]. This court will follow that middle path. In general, consistent with the bare metal defense, a manufacturer is not liable for materials it did not supply. But a duty may…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 2, 2009 · in the opinion
In re New York City Asbestos Litigation v. AC & S., Inc. (2009)
…Dalton was a plumber, Flynn was an iron worker, McNamara was a roofer, Troiano was a plumber/general contractor and Zeitler was a sailor/painter (see Comeford Aff. in Support of Consolidation OSC at ¶¶ 7-18…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)
…level of generality."). Thus, this inquiry "considers whether the general features of the incident could hypothetically have an effect on maritime commerce. It does not require that any impact actually occurred." Christensen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Ssw, Inc. (2012)
…to specific enumerated "chapters and sections ... to the exclusion of the law of the jurisdiction in which they are [\600] incorporated." These specific enumerated provisions include neither chapter 2 in general nor section 2010 in particular. (…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion
Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)
…sufficient contact with the state for the court to assume either general or limited jurisdiction over it. Plaintiffs opposed the motion, asserting among other things that ACL had consented to jurisdiction by making a general appearance…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…or dust allaying media. (Stewart Decl. ex G).\[2\] Plaintiff also emphasizes Defendant's concession that it was familiar with and subject to California general industry safety orders (Caldo Trans. 2162:16-22), that it knew…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)
…erroneous instruction. . . ."'" (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) When determining whether an error of instruction and/or instructional omission was prejudicial, the court must evaluate the state of the evidence, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2013)
…officer) ... for or relating to any act under color of such office..." II. DISCUSSION In general, a defendant can only remove a case to federal court if the plaintiff could have brought the action there originally…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Dock (2017)
…response, the plaintiff provided "little more than general allegations against" the defendant and did "not state specific facts showing that \[the plaintiff\] was actually exposed to asbestos-containing material from \[the defendant's\] products." (Ibid., italics…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Penegar v. United Parcel Service (2018)
…employment with defendant-employer. The preponderance of the evidence in view of the entire record establishes that decedent's work for defendant-employer exposed him to a greater risk of contracting mesothelioma over the general public…