No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

327 results for “General Electric”, page 14 of 17

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …testimony. Second, with regard to Dr. Brody, Plaintiffs state that he was provided no case-specific materials and offers opinions only as to general causation. (Resp. at 5.) Plaintiffs also allege that Dr. Brody did not…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Aerco Intl. (2017)

    …generally that the law of different jurisdictions may apply, absent any analysis with respect to this issue, such general statement is an insufficient basis to deny consolidation. However, this determination does not preclude the parties from…

  6. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 9, 2011 · in the opinion

    Brandt v. AW Chesterton Company (2011)

    …Mr. Brandt's exposure chart names Mack and his deposition testimony, albeit not explicitly identifying Mack, confirms the general context for that exposure, Plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence of identification to reach a jury. Therefore, after…

  7. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …tested; whether it has been the subject of peer review; whether the theory has a known or potential error rate; and whether the theory has gained general acceptance in the scientific community. Daubert, 509 U.S…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018 · in the opinion

    Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  9. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …a diesel locomotive, inside the cab or just in the general area." He acknowledged that "diesel fumes would go \[\] into the air in the general direction back toward the caboose, the cab of the engine and…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 15, 2021 · in the opinion

    Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)

    …Instead, Defendant reiterates its arguments regarding general jurisdiction and misconstrues Plaintiffs' arguments regarding Abex's New Jersey facility, stating that "Plaintiffs' position that Abex's research and development department in New Jersey constitutes its principal place…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company (2020)

    …information." Id. at [\2] (cleaned up). "If a Plaintiff's affidavit makes only general and conclusory statements regarding the need for more discovery, then denial of their request for more discovery is proper." Id. (cleaned up…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …have "heeded a warning." Id. With this standard in mind, we disagree with VW for three general reasons. First, VW's argument misunderstands how we must view Sorrentino's testimony. Sorrentino testified that he referred to…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …No. 20\]. The same analysis is true for the Plaintiffs' claims based on the duty to warn. As the Fourth Circuit explained in Baughman v. General Motors Corporation, 780 F.2d 1131, 1132-33 (4th Cir…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …not seen any reliable information to the effect that non-asbestos brake linings for drum brakes were commercially available for general or ordinary use prior to 1980 on automobiles or trucks." As part of his opinion…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · October 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Surita v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …supplies to support the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. \[Id. at 100:8-16.\] She was also responsible for general maintenance of her truck and trailers, including changing flat tires and working on the brakes. \[Id…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · April 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)

    …made in discovery, and the reality that all anticipated jury trials have faced delays due to the global coronavirus pandemic, see General Order 21-08 (continuing all jury trials through April 30, 2021), the Court does…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2019 · in the opinion

    Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)

    …DISCUSSION In their amended complaint, plaintiffs have alleged claims against Ford for: (1) general negligence under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315; (2) employer liability in Ford's capacity as Victor Michel's employer under Louisiana Revised…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nevada · September 19, 2022 · in the opinion

    Potter v. Crane Co. (2022)

    …on a theory of successor liability, they must establish a prima facie showing of an exception to the general principal that "when one corporation sells all of its assets to another, the purchaser is not liable…

  19. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · March 10, 1999 · in the opinion

    Sorenson v. Allied Products Corp. (1999)

    …the purchase of White Farm's assets. 3) There has been no sufficient exception shown to overcome the general rule that a purchaser of assets is not liable for prior actions of a selling corporation. 4)…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…