286 results for “General Electric”, page 14 of 15
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Crane v. Linkus (2010)
…appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Peter v. Sprinkmann Sons Corp. (2015)
…1994, could act on that claim. Given the purpose of the statute of repose in general and the reason for the damages exception in particular, it would not make sense to interpret "damages" to mean injury. …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Montanez v. Beck/Arnley Worldparts (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…hired Mr. Dull as Vice President and General Manager of defendant commencing "on the closing of the Acquisition."\[5\] Plaintiffs point to his duties with respect to the "day-to-day operations of \[BAWI\], assisting in…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 28, 1995 · in the opinion
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1995)
…s fees to fight asbestos litigation cases." The district court ruled that any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns-Manville and that the report from the juror was not prejudicial to the defendants…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986 · in the opinion
Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Applicable Law. We begin with the proposition that in a tort action, as a general rule, proof that a [\1457] specific defendant caused the plaintiff's harm is a prerequisite to that defendant's liability to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 17, 2019 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Edward Orton JR. Ceramic Foundation (2019)
…Ill. 2006) (allowing removing party to file supplemental jurisdictional allegations to cure defect relating to the citizenship of each partner of a general partnership even though the 30-day time period had run); Pinnacle Performance v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 18, 1984 · in the opinion
Laster v. Celotex Corp. (1984)
…268 (1979) ("\[t\]he Surgeon General advises me that clinical experience indicates a person who smokes and has been exposed to asbestos faces a greater risk of developing asbestosis and of dying from a respiratory ailment…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Carlstrand v. Domco Prods. of Texas (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…judgment on plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages. Defendant contends that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation that any of its Azrock vinyl asbestos floor products caused Mr…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Handley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2009)
…purpose of judicial construction of a statute is to determine the meaning that comports most closely with the intent of the Legislature "\with the view to promoting rather than defeating the general purpose of the statute…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 8, 1990 · in the opinion
Barnett v. City of Yonkers (1990)
…News 1426, 1428. In the Asbestos Act, Congress directed the Attorney General of the United States to ascertain the feasibility of recovering "from any person determined" to be liable the costs of detecting, removing, and replacing…
-
Court case · Nebraska Supreme Court · June 1, 2007 · in the opinion
Olivotto v. DeMarco Bros. Co. (2007)
…2d 922 (1977), we discussed the scope of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act. We stated that the act was one of general interest, not only to the worker and his employer, but to the state as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion
Bradley v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (2007)
…to establish their safety and warning-related activities were under the requisite direction of a federal officer. Federal direction requires "more than \general auspices' of a federal officer, or participation in a regulated industry." Savoie v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · February 24, 1981 · in the opinion
Austin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)
…Counts V and VI seek contribution or indemnification by BIW for any damages plaintiff may recover against Armstrong Cork. II BIW's motion for summary judgment presents three general issues: (1) Do the allegations of wilful…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998 · in the opinion
Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)
…as a mechanical formula, awards based on the number of months of suffering \[have been\] criticized ..., it nevertheless represents a general pattern to the New York cases." Id. The Dollas court, nonetheless, rejected the simplistic monthly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 15, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…known or potential error rate, and general acceptance." Elosu at 1024 (internal citations omitted). These reliability factors are nonexclusive — "the trial court has discretion to decide how to test an expert's reliability based on the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Filipek v. the Boeing Company (2017)
…NO. 23: Admit that Plaintiff Marlin Filipek was diagnosed with an asbestos- related disease prior to May 19, 2010. ANSWER: Plaintiffs incorporate by reference General Objections 1-8. Subject to and without waiving these objections, admit…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)
…indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the language in the policy. Language is ambiguous if it is reasonably open to different interpretations." Seeck v. Geico General Ins. Co., 212 S.W.3d 129, 132 (Mo…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Vitale v. Burnham, LLC (2018)
…App. 438, 451 (2010) (citations and quotations omitted). "Mere general allegations of conclusory assertions will not suffice." Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, "a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party's claim is…