291 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 14 of 15
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)
…or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…632 (1959) (emphasis added) Kermarec held that: "the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 21, 2008 · in the opinion
Early v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2008)
…Grumman Aircraft Corp. From 1965 through 1993, he worked as a millwright, maintaining machinery, including presses, ovens, boilers, pumps, and valves. He worked in the boiler room and assisted in dismantling the boiler room, which he…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)
…Myers, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. W. Thomas McGough, Jr. (argued), Robert H. Owen, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee Railroad Friction Products Corporation. Daniel Markewich (argued), Ellen G. Margolis, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, New York…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004 · in the opinion
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)
…N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.1991) ("A landowner owes the highest duty to an invitee: a duty to exercise reasonable care for his protection while he is on the landowner's premises."), reh'g denied…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)
…Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…original diversity jurisdiction when complete diversity of citizenship exists between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Battistoni v. ITW Food Equipment Group (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…washers, saws, choppers, and ovens (id.). Plaintiff further avers that the repairs included gasket removal and replacement of Hobart brand steamers, including brushing and sanding, as well as seal replacement on pipes and insulation thereon (id…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
…Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006 · in the opinion
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…the control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Graul v. Tecumseh Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…using asbestos insulation. WILSON CHALCO: Deceased from Mesothelioma. Exposed from 1971-2006 from work as laborer and maintenance, and from working around others using asbestos containing products. Exposed to asbestos containing ovens, matrix boards, valves, pumps…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · August 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Golik v. CBS Corp. (2020)
…of premises owes to the servant of the independent contractor employed to perform work on his premises the duty to avoid endangering him by the owner's own negligence or affirmative act, but owes no duty…